2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of Biceps Muscle Stiffness Measured Using Shear Wave Elastography at Different Anatomical Locations With Different Ultrasound Machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The participants were asked to hold a gel bottle so that the hand was in supination and their arm would not inadvertently internally rotate. The distance between the participants' acromioclavicular joint and the cubital fossa was measured, and the 75% distance was marked on their arms with a skin-safe marker to indicate the site of measurement with the least variability [14]. The right arm was assessed first with the elbow in full extension at 0 • flexion, then with the forearm resting on a 30 • wedge, and then on a 60 • wedge, as is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants were asked to hold a gel bottle so that the hand was in supination and their arm would not inadvertently internally rotate. The distance between the participants' acromioclavicular joint and the cubital fossa was measured, and the 75% distance was marked on their arms with a skin-safe marker to indicate the site of measurement with the least variability [14]. The right arm was assessed first with the elbow in full extension at 0 • flexion, then with the forearm resting on a 30 • wedge, and then on a 60 • wedge, as is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are already many approaches for the use of ultrasound in the assessment of tissue rheological properties [ 67 ], the most widely used being the supersonic shear wave imaging (SSI) [ 68 ]. The method has so far been attributed with a variable reliability ranging between 0.67 and 0.92 (95% CI Avg , see Table 1 ) by various studies [ 33 , 40 , 41 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 ].…”
Section: Objective Methods Of Muscle Tone Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%