2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2004.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of foF2 in the equatorial ionosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
73
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
10
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the differences of our results from Obrou et al (2003) may partly come from the longitudinal structure of h m F 2 . The observations given above are in accord with the findings reported by Bilitza et al (2004b) using data collected at the two stations, Korhogo and Ouagadougou during low, moderate and high solar activity years of 1995 and 1985, 1998 and 1993, and 2000 and 1991, respectively; to examine variability of f o F 2 at the two stations. In a comparative analysis between f o F 2 observations and IRI model at low latitude station, Ibadan,Nigeria (7.4 • N, 3.9 • E; 5 • S dip angle), Oyekola (2011) found IRI model to be larger than the measured f o F 2 in June from 1900-0500 LT and September from 1900-2300 LT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In addition, the differences of our results from Obrou et al (2003) may partly come from the longitudinal structure of h m F 2 . The observations given above are in accord with the findings reported by Bilitza et al (2004b) using data collected at the two stations, Korhogo and Ouagadougou during low, moderate and high solar activity years of 1995 and 1985, 1998 and 1993, and 2000 and 1991, respectively; to examine variability of f o F 2 at the two stations. In a comparative analysis between f o F 2 observations and IRI model at low latitude station, Ibadan,Nigeria (7.4 • N, 3.9 • E; 5 • S dip angle), Oyekola (2011) found IRI model to be larger than the measured f o F 2 in June from 1900-0500 LT and September from 1900-2300 LT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…However, Kazimirovski (2002) stated that the TEC also generates significant day-to-day variations during magnetically quiet periods due to the thermospheric dynamics caused by different types of atmospheric disturbances from the lower atmosphere. Earlier observations have confirmed that the day-to-day TEC variability caused by thermospheric dynamics in the equatorial latitudes does not usually exceed 20% (Forbes et al, 2000;Rishbeth and Mendillo, 2001;Bilitza et al, 2004). Our result shows that the maximum values of the pre-earthquake daytime positive anomalies exceeded 20%.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Ionospheric Variations Before The 26 Decembesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…More and more applications, however, require a description of the day-to-day variations. In some cases an estimate of the expected range of variability is all that is needed and there is an IRI effort underway to include a quantitative description of ionospheric variability in IRI in the form of the monthly standard deviation (Araujo-Pradere et al 2004Bilitza et al 2004). A more accurate description of the changes from day to day requires the use of real-time data and of updating or assimilation techniques to combine IRI with these data and in the process produce the Real-Time IRI (IRI-RT).…”
Section: Real-time Irimentioning
confidence: 99%