2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04163.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability ofηCarinae - III

Abstract: Spectra (1951–78) of the central object in η Car, taken by A. D. Thackeray, reveal three previously unrecorded epochs of low excitation. Since 1948, at least, these states have occurred regularly in the 2020‐d cycle proposed by Damineli et al. They last about 10 per cent of each cycle. Early slit spectra (1899–1919) suggest that at that time the object was always in a low state. JHKL photometry is reported for the period 1994–2000. This shows that the secular increase in brightness found in 1972–94 has continu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
63
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
8
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We suggested that a hot spot could have been created in an interacting binary during the close encounter (van Genderen et al 2001; Paper I). The same suggestion has been made by Feast et al (2001) on account of their NIR results.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Light And Colour Curvessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…We suggested that a hot spot could have been created in an interacting binary during the close encounter (van Genderen et al 2001; Paper I). The same suggestion has been made by Feast et al (2001) on account of their NIR results.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Light And Colour Curvessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The Mk II photometry from the years 1972-2004 was published in Whitelock et al (1983;, Feast et al (2001), and Whitelock et al (2004). The SAAO IR standard system (Carter 1990) was used and uncertainties range from of about 0.03 mag in JHK to 0.05 mag in L. Here we present the most recent Mk II photometry from [2004][2005][2006][2007][2008][2009][2010][2011][2012][2013] (Table 1).…”
Section: Observations and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whitelock et al (2004) rejected an orbital cycle of grain growth and destruction since more dramatic variations in L band than observed would be expected and Chesneau et al (2005) found in near-IR high-angular resolution (60 mas resolution) VLT/NACO images a dust-free area with a radius of 230-350 AU around η Car. Other explanations for the excess emission at periastron include S Doradustype variations (Whitelock et al 1994, Sterken et al 1999, enhanced free-free emission as newly ejected mass joins the material around η Car (Feast et al 2001), and expansion of the primary due to tidal forces (van Genderen et al 2006). It is also possible to envisage the excess emission at periastron as a consequence of grain destruction.…”
Section: Excess Emission Around the Periastron Passagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Damineli (1996) first noticed the 5.5-year periodicity in the spectroscopic changes of this object (see Damineli et al 1997Damineli et al , 2000Duncan et al 1999;Ishibashi et al 1999;Davidson et al 1999Davidson et al , 2000van Genderen et al 2003;Steiner & Damineli 2004;Whitelock et al 2004;Corcoran 2005;Weis et al 2005). On the other hand, to date, the binary nature of the central object in η Car and its orbital parameters are still a matter of debate (see, e.g., Zanella et al 1984;Davidson 1999Davidson , 2001Davidson et al 1999Davidson et al , 2000Davidson et al , 2005Ishibashi et al 1999;Smith et al 2000;Feast et al 2001;Ishibashi 2001;Pittard & Corcoran 2002;Smith et al 2003;Martin et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%