1997
DOI: 10.1029/97rs01398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of monthly time fraction of excess of atmospheric propagation parameters

Abstract: This paper investigates the variability of the monthly time fraction of excess of atmospheric propagation parameters. In the first part of the paper a theoretical investigation is carried out regarding the relationship between the variability of monthly time fraction of excess vis‐a‐vis the variability of the annual‐worst‐month time fraction of excess. It is shown that the tail of the distribution of the annual‐worst‐month time fraction of excess can be derived from the average distribution of the monthly time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the verification of this distribution the groups of data were too small to do a chi-square analysis. Therefore, a graphical test making use of rank-ordered statistics was chosen to check whether the data is normally distributed or not [7], [9]. In this test, the percentage of exceedance is converted to a parameter in such a way that if the randomvariableisnormallydistributed thenewcumulativedistribution function is a straight line with the mean value of the random variable at .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the verification of this distribution the groups of data were too small to do a chi-square analysis. Therefore, a graphical test making use of rank-ordered statistics was chosen to check whether the data is normally distributed or not [7], [9]. In this test, the percentage of exceedance is converted to a parameter in such a way that if the randomvariableisnormallydistributed thenewcumulativedistribution function is a straight line with the mean value of the random variable at .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%