2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of soil physical quality in uneroded, eroded, and depositional cropland sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be attributed to the presumably large amounts of mineral material that is susceptible to spatial redistribution after completion of the earthworks, being eroded from the source areas and deposited in the sinks. This agrees with other studies reporting that recurrence of mineral material deposition decreases soil penetration resistance in depositional sites in rangelands (Stavi et al, 2009a) and croplands (Stavi and Lal, 2011). At the same time, the mean soil penetration resistance in the source areas of each of these afforestation systems was considerably larger than that on the natural hillslopes throughout the soil profile (except the 20-30 cm depth for the 2-year-old system; Fig.…”
Section: Soil Physical Qualitysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This can be attributed to the presumably large amounts of mineral material that is susceptible to spatial redistribution after completion of the earthworks, being eroded from the source areas and deposited in the sinks. This agrees with other studies reporting that recurrence of mineral material deposition decreases soil penetration resistance in depositional sites in rangelands (Stavi et al, 2009a) and croplands (Stavi and Lal, 2011). At the same time, the mean soil penetration resistance in the source areas of each of these afforestation systems was considerably larger than that on the natural hillslopes throughout the soil profile (except the 20-30 cm depth for the 2-year-old system; Fig.…”
Section: Soil Physical Qualitysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Increasing conservation of SOC content has become a symbol of sustainable agriculture. Since SOC has a pivotal role in structuring soil particles it has primary importance in soil physical properties such as porosity, aggregate stability and infiltration (Stavi and Lal, 2011). Lal (2004) estimated that global soils contain 2500 Gt carbon (1550 Gt SOC) in their uppermost 1 m thick horizon hence this is one of the largest terrestrial pool second only to the geologic stock.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no study has systematically interlinked soil aggregate properties (size and stability) to flowpaths and hydraulic connectivity under different management practices. We posit that the degree of spatial heterogeneity in both aggregate size distribution and stability along a flow pathway is affected by both hydraulic connectivity and the type and intensity of tillage practices [11,12,[46][47][48][49] (tillage intensity herein refers to the number of tillage occurrences, and the type and severity of the disturbance i.e., tillage depth and percentage of disturbed area [50]-more frequent and severe disturbances to the soil are considered to be of high intensity, whereas less frequent and minimal disturbance is considered to be of low intensity). It is assumed therefore that the spatial heterogeneity of the aggregate proxies should reflect the spatial heterogeneity of hydraulic connectivity and management across dominant flowpaths of the landscape [45] (Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%