2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of the northeast Atlantic sea surface Δ14C and marine reservoir age and the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, a recent study concerning the 14 C content determination of marine mollusc shells collected off the European Atlantic margin between 45º N and 60º N showed that ΔR takes the value of -7±50 14 C yr (Tisnérat-Laborde et al, 2010) which is in accordance with the prevailing oceanographic conditions of that region influenced by the North Atlantic Current and where the coastal upwelling is not present. Another example could be the research carried out concerning the Canary Archipelago.…”
Section: The Marine Radiocarbon Reservoir Effect (δR)supporting
confidence: 53%
“…On the other hand, a recent study concerning the 14 C content determination of marine mollusc shells collected off the European Atlantic margin between 45º N and 60º N showed that ΔR takes the value of -7±50 14 C yr (Tisnérat-Laborde et al, 2010) which is in accordance with the prevailing oceanographic conditions of that region influenced by the North Atlantic Current and where the coastal upwelling is not present. Another example could be the research carried out concerning the Canary Archipelago.…”
Section: The Marine Radiocarbon Reservoir Effect (δR)supporting
confidence: 53%
“…yr B.P., depending on the strength of the North Atlantic Current (NAC ;Wanamaker Jr et al, 2012). Feedbacks between the NAC and the NAO atmospheric circulation pattern have also influenced DR along French Atlantic coasts between 1885 and 1950 CE by 90 to 170 years (Tisnérat-Laborde et al, 2010). In the present study, such changes in the DR parameter were not considered for calibrating the 14 C ages (Table 2), which could have an impact on the chronological boundaries of CSPs.…”
Section: Uncertainties and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…First, 14 C ages were calibrated against Marine13 reference curve (Reimer et al, 2013). The regional reservoir offset value DR, which is here −28 ± 23, is the inverse-error weighted average of 4 measurements carried out on mollusc shells of the Pertuis Charentais (−36 ± 40, −34 ± 60, −32 ± 39, +7 ± 60; Tisnérat-Laborde et al, 2010) .…”
Section: C Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gray arrows indicate the  14 C drops discussed in the text. Tisnérat-Laborde et al (2010) showed that NEA surface waters result from a mixture of subtropical (Bermuda 14 C signature) and subpolar mode waters, the latter being the upstream source of the 14 Cdepleted Labrador Sea. This mixing leads to lower  14 C values for the NEA and, consequently, for the Mediterranean Sea compared to Bermuda waters.…”
Section: Pre-bomb D 14 C Signaturementioning
confidence: 99%