1988
DOI: 10.1288/00005537-198806000-00018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of the thymidine labeling index in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Abstract: Tritiated thymidine (3HTdR) labeling is the standard technique for determining the kinetic activity of tumors. This method has been used to label multiple sections of tumor specimens obtained from seven patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Considerable variability was observed in the labeling index in different sites from the same specimen. To reduce the large sampling error due to heterogeneity, we recommend that an average value be determined from multiple sections when employ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a series of 52 oral cavity carcinomas the mean thymidine labelling index was 11%, ranging from 0.01% to 50% (Silvestrini et al, 1984). Greenberg et al (1988) studied seven patients with a squamous carcinoma of the head and neck and found a median thymidine labelling index of 3.7%. They also noted considerable variability in multiple samples of the same tumour, ranging from 0.2 to 23.7%.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In a series of 52 oral cavity carcinomas the mean thymidine labelling index was 11%, ranging from 0.01% to 50% (Silvestrini et al, 1984). Greenberg et al (1988) studied seven patients with a squamous carcinoma of the head and neck and found a median thymidine labelling index of 3.7%. They also noted considerable variability in multiple samples of the same tumour, ranging from 0.2 to 23.7%.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They were immediately put into transport medium and sent to the laboratory. Greenberg et al [18] observed considerable variability in the labeling index in different sites of the same specimen. They suggested that an average value be determined from multiple sections.…”
Section: Tissue Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%