Variability of topsoil hydraulic conductivity along the hillslope transects delineated in four areas strongly affected by soil erosion

Abstract

Soil hydraulic conductivities of topsoils were studied at 5 points of the hillslope transects delineated at 4 geomorphologically diverse areas, where the original soil types (Chernozem, Luvisol and two Cambisols) were due to erosion transformed into different soil unites. Hydraulic conductivities of saturated soils and for a pressure head of –2 cm were measured directly in the field using a Guelph permeameter (K s,GP ) and mini disk tension infiltrometer (K h=– 2 ,MDI ), and in the laboratory using a multistep outflow method (K s,MSO , K h= – 2 ,MSO ). While K s,GP ≈ K s,MSO in the Chernozem and Cambisol (sandy loam) regions, and K s,GP < K s,MSO in the Luvisol and Cambisol (loam) regions. The K s values obtained using different methods showed different trends along the hillslope transects. The K h= – 2 values obtained using different methods showed similar trends along the transects in the Chernozem and Luvisol regions. These trends could be explained by the position within the transects (i.e., different stages of erosion/accumulation processes). No relationships were found between the K h=– 2 values in the Cambisol regions. The pressure head at an inflection point of the a soil-water retention curve was the main parameter, which appeared to associate (negative correlation) with K h=– 2 and K s,MSO in the Chernozem and Luvisol regions.

How various mulch materials can affect the soil hydro-physical properties

“…The soil properties assessed using the mini disk tension infiltrometer were not investigated in our previous study. The values of Kh = -2 cm strongly depended on a method of evaluation (Nikodem et al, 2021). The largest values of the soil hydraulic conductivity (Kh = -2 cm, W) were obtained for the NFB plot and the lowest values for the ATE plot.…”