1990
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199003000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of Ultrasonic Pachometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that the Topcon specular microscope provided measurements that were, on average, 32 µm less than those from the ultrasound pachymeter. Other studies have documented the variability of different types of pachymetric data 9 ; corneal thickness measurements from a Haag Streit (Bern, Switzerland) optical pachymeter were also found to be significantly less than ultrasound pachymetric measurements. 10 Despite the difference between the values provided by the instruments in our study, however, the similarities in the overall ranges and SEMs point to similar reproducibility for the 2 instruments.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We found that the Topcon specular microscope provided measurements that were, on average, 32 µm less than those from the ultrasound pachymeter. Other studies have documented the variability of different types of pachymetric data 9 ; corneal thickness measurements from a Haag Streit (Bern, Switzerland) optical pachymeter were also found to be significantly less than ultrasound pachymetric measurements. 10 Despite the difference between the values provided by the instruments in our study, however, the similarities in the overall ranges and SEMs point to similar reproducibility for the 2 instruments.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Nowadays, measurements of corneal thickness are easier, more reproducible and more accurate when using ultrasonic pachymeters [first developed by Kremer (1980) with the advent of radial keratotomy] (Rapuano 1993), computer-assisted laser pachymetry and laser Doppler interferometry (Gritz & McDonnell 1990;Hitzenberger et al 1992;Rapuano et al 1993). Gordon et al (1990) found good reproducibility of ultrasonic central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements that also were found to be less variable and more reproducible by Higgins et al (1993). Thus, knowing the normal value of the CCT in newborn babies can be used as a reference in the early diagnosis and control of corneal oedema in some ocular disease such as primary congenital glaucoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…22,23 To provide high-precision CCT measurements with low interobserver and intersession variability, the measurements in this study were performed using ACMaster, which is based on the principle of partial coherence interferometry as reported previously. 19,[24][25][26] To our knowledge, only 1 study 16 described 9 cases of irreversible corneal decompensation after use of dorzolamide.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%