2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of unconfined compressive strength in relation to number of test samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They further demonstrated that for a given rock and test type, the minimal sample size varies from one case to the other. The conclusions by Gill et al (2005) are in direct agreement with more recent work by Ruffolo and Shakoor (2009). The latter work investigated the number of required tests to estimate the mean unconfined compressive strength of different rock types.…”
Section: How Reliable Are Collected Datasupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They further demonstrated that for a given rock and test type, the minimal sample size varies from one case to the other. The conclusions by Gill et al (2005) are in direct agreement with more recent work by Ruffolo and Shakoor (2009). The latter work investigated the number of required tests to estimate the mean unconfined compressive strength of different rock types.…”
Section: How Reliable Are Collected Datasupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Unless they can be analysed and summarised, they are of limited use. In order to be useful, data have to be processed and 9 Minimum number of samples needed to estimate mean unconfined compressive strength based upon acceptable deviation from mean and corresponding coefficient of variation, using confidence interval approach, after Ruffolo and Shakoor (2009) At least three converted into information. In a deep mining context it may very well be that, depending on the level of detail required, one person's information is another person's data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation in sonic velocity logging data (Figure 3h) similarly implies a frequent variation in rock strength [Chang et al, 2006]. Incorporating such heterogeneity in the distribution of rock properties in modeling of a geologic medium is fundamental to establishing confidence in a risk assessment of instability for drilling and excavation design [Einstein and Baecher, 1983;Tang, 1997;Hoek et al, 2000;Moos et al, 2003;Ruffolo and Shakoor, 2009;Sari, 2009].…”
Section: Remarks Of Geologic Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unconfined compressive strength is a commonly used parameter for rock mass characterization, slope stability analysis, bearing capacity analysis for foundations, the design of underground excavations, and selection of excavation methods (Ruffolo and Shakoor, 2009 …”
Section: Variability Of Unconfined Compressive Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unconfined compressive strength is a commonly used parameter for rock mass characterization, slope stability analysis, bearing capacity analysis for foundations, the design of underground excavations, and selection of excavation methods (Ruffolo and Shakoor, 2009). The estimation of unconfined compressive strength can be challenging since the value of unconfined compressive strength frequently varies from the same rock.…”
Section: Variability Of Unconfined Compressive Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%