2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable and Asymmetric Range of Enslaving: Fingers Can Act Independently over Small Range of Flexion

Abstract: The variability in the numerous tasks in which we use our hands is very large. However, independent movement control of individual fingers is limited. To assess the extent of finger independency during full-range finger flexion including all finger joints, we studied enslaving (movement in non-instructed fingers) and range of independent finger movement through the whole finger flexion trajectory in single and multi-finger movement tasks. Thirteen young healthy subjects performed single- and multi-finger movem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, no other studies investigating finger force enslaving with a similar task as in our experiment have been reported. However, in agreement with our findings Van den Noort et al [ 21 ] found that the index finger could flex independently, i.e. without movements of the non-instructed fingers, for some range.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To our knowledge, no other studies investigating finger force enslaving with a similar task as in our experiment have been reported. However, in agreement with our findings Van den Noort et al [ 21 ] found that the index finger could flex independently, i.e. without movements of the non-instructed fingers, for some range.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…They claimed that enslaving effect should have been different between two mentioned tasks if peripheral connections between tendons of extrinsic muscles had effect on enslaving (because there are no apparent connections between intrinsic muscles in contrast with extrinsic muscles) [ 6 ]. In contrast, other studies involving finger movement [ 15 , 21 ]indicated substantial contributions of mechanical connections. Lang and Schieber [ 15 ]showed that the enslaving effect was generally similar during passive (i.e., the finger was flexed and extend by an external force) and active (i.e., voluntary moved) finger flexion movements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…It is not particularly obvious why the ringer finger is appreciated as the center of clique-formation of the fingers and upper limb, but this might relate to previous findings showing relatively enlarged cortical representations for the ring finger in S1 during somatosensation [55]. One possible explanation might be that the ring finger’s constrained freedom of movement [56–58] could result in the ring finger acting as a ‘common denominator’ for various multi-digit movements, leading to the observed digit interconnectedness surrounding the ring finger [59,60]. On the basis of betweenness centrality coefficients the shoulder and wrist are characterized as central, and therefore as important body parts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the extent of finger movement individualization is unlikely to have driven variability in the cortical tuning curves. While anatomical enslavement in the hand affects individual finger movements at higher angular flexion, detailed hand kinematics data have demonstrated that, for low angular flexion of individual fingers, analogous to those used for button presses during the fMRI tasks, a high degree of independent finger movement is possible in the human hand [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%