2021
DOI: 10.1109/joe.2020.3000703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable Buoyancy or Propeller-Based Systems for Hovering Capable Vehicles: An Energetic Comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…VBEs can be classified based on the energy transformation they use to displace water from a floodable volume [5] as follows:…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…VBEs can be classified based on the energy transformation they use to displace water from a floodable volume [5] as follows:…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The remaining available compression length of the spring is sufficient for the required volume change to be achieved. The force needed to move the piston at depth is defined by equation (5).…”
Section: A Spring Sizingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electromechanical systems rely on linear actuators to move the piston to change the buoyancy of the system, and the construction is straightforward to integrate (Ranganathan et al , 2015). In Ranganathan and Thondiyath (2016), Carneiro et al (2020) and Masmitjà et al (2014), VBS modules with linear actuator units as the power source are designed, but the module space utilization is poor and a single linear actuator is prone to leakage due to uneven force during operation. Furthermore, these studies neither included extensible designs nor investigated the regulation performance of the VBS at different depths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also allows the angle of attack of the vehicle in horizontal motion to be reduced, thus reducing drag and increasing horizontal propeller efficiency [5]. Moreover, it has been recently shown [6] that the use of BCMs is significantly beneficial in hovering tasks compared to the use of vertical propellers, even for relatively small depths and mission lengths. The use of BCMs has, however, some drawbacks, namely regarding the maneuverability of the vehicle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common ones are linear electric drives using seawater as working fluid [8][9][10][11][12] and hydraulic pumping systems [13][14][15][16]. A description of more particular solutions involving the use of pneumatic, thermal and hybrid solutions can be found in [6,17]. Hydraulic solutions typically lead to more compact devices than exclusively electric ones but are, however, less efficient at shallower depths (up to 100 m) due to the high relative weight of mechanical friction losses at low pressures [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%