23rd AIAA/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 2015
DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-1051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable Camber Compliant Wing - Wind Tunnel Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Superior aerodynamic performance of seamless skin variable camber wing due to morphing leading edge and trailing edge and span wise wing twist has been demonstrated by Joo et al's VCCW concept through wind tunnel testing (seen in Fig. 1(a)) [7,8]. a) b) Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Superior aerodynamic performance of seamless skin variable camber wing due to morphing leading edge and trailing edge and span wise wing twist has been demonstrated by Joo et al's VCCW concept through wind tunnel testing (seen in Fig. 1(a)) [7,8]. a) b) Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In the demonstrative design stated later in this paper, the leading edge morphing is restrained as wind tunnel testing shows that XFOIL is unable to accurately estimate the morphing leading edge part [7]. To achieve a subtler control of both leading edge and trailing edge, Bernstein Polynomial of larger order may be applicable in the design, which will not be discussed in this paper.…”
Section: Fig 5 Comparison Between Original Geometry and Parametric mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the wing was smaller than the test section, a custom fixture had to be designed to support the model as well as measure forces and moments. An in-depth discussion of the wind tunnel and the testing procedures is detailed in the paper by Marks et al 11 Force and moment data, and the resulting lift and drag acquired by the force couples embedded in the support structure, is not included in the analysis presented here. Fixture alignment issues and other unknowns will require further analysis to be fully understood.…”
Section: A Experimental Testingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The specific design of the model is covered more in two companion papers. 1,11 The flexible composite material, used to allow the high range of motion during camber changes, proved to be difficult to model within FEA and was the limiting factor in this analysis. A 1 ft version FEA model was built to verify the desired shapes, and while this particular FEA model did not include all of the skin material, it was still able to match the desired camber shapes.…”
Section: B Finite Element Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%