2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-7299-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable coefficients reciprocal squared model based on multi-constraints of aircraft assembly tolerance allocation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [142], the parameters of cost-tolerance functions for single processes are estimated from the manufacturing difficulty of the feature with respect to the process, calculated using a method based on fuzzy logic. In [71], an equation based on process constraints (machine tools, workers, machining and assembly accuracy) is iteratively solved with the Newton's method to calculate the coefficients of a reciprocal squared function, thus obtaining a more complex model depending on a multiplicity of variables (variable coefficients reciprocal squared). The cost data available in literature cover a small part of the possible combinations of influencing factors (product type, feature type, manufacturing process etc.).…”
Section: Methods For Parameter Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [142], the parameters of cost-tolerance functions for single processes are estimated from the manufacturing difficulty of the feature with respect to the process, calculated using a method based on fuzzy logic. In [71], an equation based on process constraints (machine tools, workers, machining and assembly accuracy) is iteratively solved with the Newton's method to calculate the coefficients of a reciprocal squared function, thus obtaining a more complex model depending on a multiplicity of variables (variable coefficients reciprocal squared). The cost data available in literature cover a small part of the possible combinations of influencing factors (product type, feature type, manufacturing process etc.).…”
Section: Methods For Parameter Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [69], the function is extended to the case of multiple features machined on the same component: the fixed cost is counted only once for the part, while the variable costs are added together for the different features. [53] 0.3-0.5 0.45 [49] 0.01-0.07 0.7-0.9 [71] 7-15 1-4 [67,72] -0.45 [47,48,60,73] -…”
Section: Reciprocal Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This adds robustness to the results of this work, because any uncertainty on the parameters (especially the exponent k and the coefficients related to material and feature type) is unlikely to have a strong impact on the optimal proportions between the tolerances. If k = 0.55, the tolerances can be set proportionally to the following factor: (32) which can be simplified into:…”
Section: Properties and Scaling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative to regression, neural networks have been trained with cost-tolerance data for both single [29] and combined processes [30]; the resulting cost-tolerance models are said to allow a more accurate approximation of actual costs. This drives allocation away from the use of an explicit cost-tolerance function, as it has also been attempted using fuzzy methods [31] and the iterative solution of an equation based on process constraints [32]. As opposed to using published cost data, some studies propose procedures to allow the collection and maintenance of cost data at manufacturing companies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%