2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.11.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable Field Analytical Ultracentrifugation: II. Gravitational Sweep Sedimentation Velocity

Abstract: Sedimentation velocity (SV) analytical ultracentrifugation is a classical biophysical technique for the determination of the size-distribution of macromolecules, macromolecular complexes, and nanoparticles. SV has traditionally been carried out at a constant rotor speed, which limits the range of sedimentation coefficients that can be detected in a single experiment. Recently we have introduced methods to implement experiments with variable rotor speeds, in combination with variable field solutions to the Lamm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The samples assembled in the absence of ATP was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm (∼16,000 × g). Samples containing ATP were analyzed by the gravtional sweep method (45), and centrifuged initially for 1 h at 20,000 rpm (∼29,000 × g), immediately followed by centrifugation at 50,000 rpm (∼182,000 × g). Interference (refractive index) and 295-nm absorbance scans were started immediately, and were collected until no further sedimentation boundary movement was observed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples assembled in the absence of ATP was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm (∼16,000 × g). Samples containing ATP were analyzed by the gravtional sweep method (45), and centrifuged initially for 1 h at 20,000 rpm (∼29,000 × g), immediately followed by centrifugation at 50,000 rpm (∼182,000 × g). Interference (refractive index) and 295-nm absorbance scans were started immediately, and were collected until no further sedimentation boundary movement was observed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boundary data (Figure 6A, C) show quite a bit of noise, which can be contrasted to that shown in Figures 2 and 3, as is anticipated from Mie scattering effects. 27 These effects are similar to the haziness of samples seen by eye for very large particles. Nevertheless, the data are of sufficient quality to extract a set of peaks in a model-free continuous sedimentation distribution, ls- g *( s ), resulting in random residuals derived from the fitting of the data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…26 However, implementation of this approach for data analysis has only recently been developed in Sedfit, subsequent to the work described here. 27 A similar approach that has been implemented in Sedanal some time ago is the MSM approach, which collects data serially over a discrete set of rotor speeds, 24,25 and is the method that is used in this study. The analysis algorithm, WDA, plots the data in the form of s * g ( s *) as a function of s *.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the major virtues of the integral approach is that all experimental data can be incorporated, and as an explicit model for the sedimentation process, ls- g *( s ) can be compared transparently with the experimental data in the original data space to examine the quality of fit. The approach is very general, and without any further complications refinements on χ 1, nd are possible to account for solvent compressibility, 51 time-varying centrifugal fields, 52 , the finite scanning speed of the scanning systems, 3 optical signal magnification gradients, 53 or spatiotemporal modulation of signal increments in fluorescence detection. 54 …”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%