2019
DOI: 10.5194/bg-2019-79
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable habitat depth of the planktonic foraminifera <i>Neogloboquadrina pachyderma</i> in the northern high latitudes explained by sea-ice and chlorophyll concentration

Abstract: <p><strong>Abstract.</strong> Neogloboquadrina pachyderma is the dominant species in the polar regions. In the northern high latitude ocean, it makes up more than 90 % of the total planktonic foraminifera assemblages, making it the dominant pelagic calcifier and carrier of paleoceanographic proxies. To assess the reaction of this species to future climate change and to be able to interpret the paleoecological signal contained in its shells, its habitat de… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet our understanding of LPF ecology is fragmented, especially in the northern polar regions. Little is known about causes of interannual variability in production in terms of absolute abundance (concentration) and species distribution patterns (e.g., Schiebel, 2002;Schiebel & Hemleben, 2000), the controls of vertical habitat changes (Greco et al, 2019;Kretschmer et al, 2018;Rebotim et al, 2017), and how the vertical habitat varies ontogenetically (Bijma et al, 1990;Hemleben et al, 1989;Schiebel et al, 1997). Also, linkage between the reproduction cycle of the LPF and the lunar cycle is barely known (Bijma et al, 1990;Erez et al, 1991;Hemleben et al, 1989;Jonkers et al, 2015;Schiebel & Hemleben, 2017;Volkmann, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet our understanding of LPF ecology is fragmented, especially in the northern polar regions. Little is known about causes of interannual variability in production in terms of absolute abundance (concentration) and species distribution patterns (e.g., Schiebel, 2002;Schiebel & Hemleben, 2000), the controls of vertical habitat changes (Greco et al, 2019;Kretschmer et al, 2018;Rebotim et al, 2017), and how the vertical habitat varies ontogenetically (Bijma et al, 1990;Hemleben et al, 1989;Schiebel et al, 1997). Also, linkage between the reproduction cycle of the LPF and the lunar cycle is barely known (Bijma et al, 1990;Erez et al, 1991;Hemleben et al, 1989;Jonkers et al, 2015;Schiebel & Hemleben, 2017;Volkmann, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following discussion we use some general characteristics for subdividing the studied period and interpreting the environmental conditions: As foraminifer production and flux in the polar region is highly influenced by food availability, an extensive sea‐ice cover in the polar region and its associated limited light penetration, is the primary influence leading to reduced fluxes (Carstens et al, ; Kohfeld et al, ; Ramseier et al, ). Hence, as light and nutrients are limited below sea‐ice, the foraminifer flux can be used as a proxy for sea‐ice cover changes (Greco et al, ). Oceanic frontal processes provide an increased nutrient supply and enhanced productivity although they are also linked to the extent of the summer (polar front) or winter (arctic front) sea‐ice cover (Johannessen et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just before and after the H6 meltwater peak (GI‐18 and GI‐17), the 22CC foraminifer flux increases to moderate levels when the δ 18 O values increase, apparently as a result of diminished freshwater input. N. pachyderma is thought to adjust its depth habitat following the pycnocline and hence inhabits greater depths during conditions of increased freshwater supply or sea‐ice (Greco et al, ;Pflaumann et al, ; Simstich et al, ). We exclude the possibility of lower fluxes due to sediment export or erosion since we expect bottom currents to be weaker during this glacial period as the thermohaline circulation was also reduced during H6 (Böhm et al, ; Hunter, Wilkinson, Louarn, et al, ; Rahmstorf, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Yermak Plateau, located north of the Svalbard archipelago, lies at the gateway to the central 85 Arctic Ocean, in an area characterized by the interaction between Atlantic and Arctic waters. The cold surface layer is dominated by the polar foraminifera N. pachyderma, which has highest abundances in the top 200 m (Carstens and Wefer, 1992;Carstens et al, 1997;Pados and Spielhagen, 2014;Greco et al, 2019). Cassidulina neoteretis is one of the dominant benthic species in sediments from the Yermak Plateau (Bergsten, 1994;Wollenburg and Mackensen, 1998;Wollenburg et al, 2004) and its abundance is often associated with the presence of Atlantic water (Polyak and 90 Solheim, 1994;Slubowska et al, 2005).…”
Section: Sample Materials and Study Area 80mentioning
confidence: 99%