2003
DOI: 10.1577/t01-166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable Migratory Patterns of Different Adult Rainbow Trout Life History Types in a Southwest Alaska Watershed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Radio-tracking studies of rainbow trout, brown trout, bulltrout (Salvelinus confluentus), and cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki) under natural flow regimes are consistent in their findings that individual trout tend to remain in a small home area, generally <1 km, during non-spawning periods (Clapp et al 1990;Young 1996Young , 1998Knouft and Spotila 2002;Ovidio et al 2002;Schrank et al 2003;Aarestrup et al 2005;Popoff and Neumann 2005;Hojesjo et al 2007), but that they may move longer distances (e.g., 3-63 km) during migrations to spawning habitat (Bailey et al 1978;Meyers et al 1992;Brown and Mackay 1995;Swanberg 1997;Ovidio et al 1998;Burrell et al 2000;Hilderbrand and Kershner 2000;Meka et al 2003;Arnekleiv and Roenning 2004;Bahr and Shrimpton 2004;Bettinger and Bettoli 2004;Muhlfeld and Marotz 2005;Venman and Dedual 2005). In the South Fork American River rainbow trout would be expected to spawn in spring, as high winter flows recede.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Radio-tracking studies of rainbow trout, brown trout, bulltrout (Salvelinus confluentus), and cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki) under natural flow regimes are consistent in their findings that individual trout tend to remain in a small home area, generally <1 km, during non-spawning periods (Clapp et al 1990;Young 1996Young , 1998Knouft and Spotila 2002;Ovidio et al 2002;Schrank et al 2003;Aarestrup et al 2005;Popoff and Neumann 2005;Hojesjo et al 2007), but that they may move longer distances (e.g., 3-63 km) during migrations to spawning habitat (Bailey et al 1978;Meyers et al 1992;Brown and Mackay 1995;Swanberg 1997;Ovidio et al 1998;Burrell et al 2000;Hilderbrand and Kershner 2000;Meka et al 2003;Arnekleiv and Roenning 2004;Bahr and Shrimpton 2004;Bettinger and Bettoli 2004;Muhlfeld and Marotz 2005;Venman and Dedual 2005). In the South Fork American River rainbow trout would be expected to spawn in spring, as high winter flows recede.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Our study focused on rainbow trout larger than 450 mm fork length (FL) because we believed they would be least affected by tagging (Meka et al 2003). The fish were captured by fly fishing at the mouth of the Tongariro River and at the Fence Pool, 20 km upstream.…”
Section: Radio Taggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rainbow trout are known to migrate considerable distances (Meka et al 2003), and so fatigue is unlikely to explain the slow travel speed. The Tongariro River contains suitable spawning habitat throughout its length and we suspect that as soon as the fish enter the river they are already in the slow-down period (Heggberget et al 1996).…”
Section: Speed Of Travelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Alagnak Wild River, a conservation unit partially located within the Katmai National Park and Preserve of the National Park Service in southwest Alaska, supports a naturally reproducing population of wild rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) which are targeted by a popular catch-and-release only sport fishery. Catchand-release angling regulations were implemented due to concerns over the health of the trout population that is subjected to intense angling pressure, with reports from local guides and anglers of high incidences of hooking scars and decreasing fish size and abundance (Meka et al, 2003). Approximately 30% of Alagnak River rainbow trout have at least one scar purportedly due to previous hooking, indicating that a substantial portion of the population is subjected to multiple angling captures (Meka, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%