Microbes without plasmids divide faster than those harbouring them. Microbiolo-6 gists rely on this difference in growth rate between both types to foresee whether 7 a plasmid will be maintained, or else purged by the host to avoid extinction. Here 8 I report that plasmids change multiple life-history traits, and I demonstrate that 9 growth rate alone can be a bad predictor for plasmid maintenance. Pairwise com-10 petition experiments between two constructs of Escherichia coli-one of which car-11 ries a plasmid-revealed that harbouring plasmids can also increase yield and delay 12 growth (lag). Crucially, yield engaged in a trade-off with growth rate. The plasmid 13 borne by one construct (R), non-transmissible and with a tetracycline-resistance 14 gene, reduced its host's growth rate by 20%. However, given this trade-off, R 15 outgrew its sensitive counterpart (S) in the absence of tetracycline when the com-16 petition favoured yield over growth rate. Trade-offs like this can challenge the 17 application of concepts that depend on carriage costs: R-mutants with additional 18 copies of the plasmid exploited this trade-off, and were selected for in tetracycline 19concentrations below the so-called 'minimal selective concentration'-the lowest an-20 timicrobial concentration thought to select for resistant mutants. My data suggests 21 that carriage costs interfere with multiple traits. Whether plasmids are costly to 22 maintain will therefore depend on the relationship between them, and which is un-23 der strongest selection. It also demonstrates that each trait reports different drug 24 sensitivity, exposing new opportunities for therapy design.
26Plasmids are independent genetic elements that complement the chromosome of prokaryotes 1,2 27 and eukaryotes 3 alike. They can benefit cells harbouring them-notoriously in the form of 28 resistance to antibiotics-but the metabolic costs associated with their upkeep can reduce the 29 host's growth rate 2,4 . Clinicians and evolutionary biologists exploit the sensitivity of growth rate 30 to plasmid carriage, using pairwise competition experiments to estimate the costs of plasmid 31 maintenance 5-8 and whether a plasmid will be maintained through time. Their conclusion is 32 straightforward: microbes without plasmids multiply faster in environments where plasmids are 33 not beneficial, and overthrow microbes harbouring them 4,7 .
34Plasmids will therefore be preserved when the benefits they provide outweigh the reduction 35 in growth rate that they impose. Bacteria, however, can maintain plasmids that have no evident 36 benefit-despite reducing their growth rate 2,[9][10][11] . So, where is the hidden benefit? Plasmids are 37 2 known to reduce the host's growth rate, but the metabolic alterations that plasmids introduce 38 are unclear [12][13][14][15] . Here I asked whether growth rate is the only life-history trait that is sensitive 39 to plasmid carriage, and it is not. I analysed the growth dynamics of two identical constructs 16 40 of Escherichia coli, one of which ...