2017
DOI: 10.1038/srep42958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable salinity responses of 12 alfalfa genotypes and comparative expression analyses of salt-response genes

Abstract: Twelve alfalfa genotypes that were selected for biomass under salinity, differences in Na and Cl concentrations in shoots and K/Na ratio were evaluated in this long-term salinity experiment. The selected plants were cloned to reduce genetic variability within each genotype. Salt tolerance (ST) index of the genotypes ranged from 0.39 to 1. The most salt-tolerant genotypes SISA14-1 (G03) and AZ-90ST (G10), the top performers for biomass, exhibited the least effect on shoot number and height. SISA14-1 (G03) accum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

11
95
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
11
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found out that Under higher high hypertonic potential, the reduction in the germination rate was less for the salinity-tolerant variety (GBK043094), compared with most salt sensitive variety (GBK043050). Our finding was in accordance to previous work in lettuce (Ahmed et al, 2019), alfalfa (Sandhu et al, 2017) and wheat (Tounsi et al, 2017) under saline conditions. In addition, a high degree of shoot growth depression in seedlings grown under salinity stress was clearly noticeable, more in the salt-sensitive varieties, which displayed reduced leaf area, leaf chlorosis, leaf burns and plant death, symptoms associated with plant toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found out that Under higher high hypertonic potential, the reduction in the germination rate was less for the salinity-tolerant variety (GBK043094), compared with most salt sensitive variety (GBK043050). Our finding was in accordance to previous work in lettuce (Ahmed et al, 2019), alfalfa (Sandhu et al, 2017) and wheat (Tounsi et al, 2017) under saline conditions. In addition, a high degree of shoot growth depression in seedlings grown under salinity stress was clearly noticeable, more in the salt-sensitive varieties, which displayed reduced leaf area, leaf chlorosis, leaf burns and plant death, symptoms associated with plant toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…It has been established that Na + and K + have similar cellular effects despite the fact Na + inhibits K + absorption through binding and obstructing to its transport system (Flowers and Yeo (1986). Many studies have reported that plants growing under high NaCl concentrations have low ratios of K + /Na + ratio caused by deficiency of intracellular K + (Dugasa et al, 2018; Cirillo et al, 2018; Sandhu et al, 2017; Sarabi et al, 2017). The same phenomenon was also observed in this study, where increment of NaCl concentration decreased the leaf K + /Na + ratios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though a reduction in growth rate and shoot mass were common, high genetic diversity existed among alfalfa populations under salt stress [16,35,48], suggesting an adequate genetic variation for further selection for improved salt tolerance. Lei et al [49] compared the performance of seven alfalfa cultivars under NaCl stress and found that the growth rate of salt-tolerant cultivars was less affected by a high salt stress of~50 dS m −1 .…”
Section: Effect Of Salt Stress On Morphology Growth Forage Yield Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Arshad et al [27] and Lei et al [28] reported that drought tolerance in alfalfa is a key challenge in improving its productivity. Forage yield of alfalfa could be tremendously affected by salinity [29][30][31][32][33]. Li and Su [34] reported alfalfa annual forage yield as function of irrigation amount and which varied from 11.7 to 18.6 Mg ha −1 in China with increasing trend in seasonal irrigation [35,36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%