2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.12.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable selection for modelling effects of eutrophication on stream and river ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
1
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
0
37
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Solheim and Gulati (2008) Many studies of this kind however, have a short reach of application within the wide diversity of aquatic ecosystems, due to focus on a limited range of water bodies, for example shallow or oligotrophic lakes with specific characteristics (Leuven et al 1987;Leuven, 1988), or water systems that are under heavy anthropogenic pressure like ditches and streams in agricultural areas (Chambers, et al 2008) and urban drainage systems (Vermonden et al, 2009). This was also the conclusion of Nijboer and Verdonschot (2004) who stated that the sensitivity of a stream to eutrophication depends on local stream characteristics and that this aspect should be included in a generally applicable model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Solheim and Gulati (2008) Many studies of this kind however, have a short reach of application within the wide diversity of aquatic ecosystems, due to focus on a limited range of water bodies, for example shallow or oligotrophic lakes with specific characteristics (Leuven et al 1987;Leuven, 1988), or water systems that are under heavy anthropogenic pressure like ditches and streams in agricultural areas (Chambers, et al 2008) and urban drainage systems (Vermonden et al, 2009). This was also the conclusion of Nijboer and Verdonschot (2004) who stated that the sensitivity of a stream to eutrophication depends on local stream characteristics and that this aspect should be included in a generally applicable model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Ecosystem responses to eutrophication are most studied in standing waters, but nutrient addition also enhances primary production in streams, predominantly of benthic algae (Lawrence and Gresens 2004, Torrecilla et al 2005), but can also enhance growth of pelagic algae (Smith et al 1999). Eutrophication of running waters may lead to reduction of water clarity, taste and odor problems, blockage of intake screens and filters, restriction of swimming and other waterbased recreation, harmful diel fluctuations in pH and in dissolved oxygen concentrations, reduction of habitat quality for macroinvertebrates and fish spawning, and an increase in the probability of fish kills (Nijboer and Verdonschot 2004). Apart from causing eutrophication, enhanced deposition of inorganic nitrogen can also increase the concentration of hydrogen ions in freshwater ecosystems with low acid-neutralizing capacity, resulting in acidification of those systems (Camargo and Alonso 2006).…”
Section: Nutrientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nutrient enrichment produces excessive algal growth, which in turn adversely affects stream animal communities (Nordin, 1985). The most common ecological phenomena caused by nutrient enrichment are increases in periphyton biomass (Bourassa and Cattaneo, 1998), shifts in macroinvertebrate communities from sensitive to more tolerant species (Allan, 2004;Chambers et al, 2006), and biodiversity losses (Nijboer and Verdonschot, 2004).…”
Section: Relationships Among Naemp Criteria and Their Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%