2018
DOI: 10.1002/asjc.1785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable Structure Predefined‐Time Stabilization of Second‐Order Systems

Abstract: A controller that stabilizes second-order vector systems in predefined-time is introduced in this paper. That is, for second-order systems a controller is designed such that the trajectories reach the origin in a time defined in advance. The proposed controller is a variable structure controller that first drive the system trajectories to a linear manifold in predefined time and then drives the system trajectories to a non-smooth manifold with the predefined-time stability property, in predefined time also; th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16,19 However, it is still difficult to derive a relatively simple relationship between the system parameters and the upper bound of the settling time. 20,21 This drawback yields some difficulties in the tuning of the system parameters to achieve a prescribed-time stabilization (see the work of Cruz-Zavala et al, 7 for instance). The computation of the least upper bound of the settling time is usually not an easy task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16,19 However, it is still difficult to derive a relatively simple relationship between the system parameters and the upper bound of the settling time. 20,21 This drawback yields some difficulties in the tuning of the system parameters to achieve a prescribed-time stabilization (see the work of Cruz-Zavala et al, 7 for instance). The computation of the least upper bound of the settling time is usually not an easy task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it represents a wide class of systems, which present the fixed‐time stability property through homogeneity and Lyapunov analysis frameworks . However, it is still difficult to derive a relatively simple relationship between the system parameters and the upper bound of the settling time . This drawback yields some difficulties in the tuning of the system parameters to achieve a prescribed‐time stabilization (see the work of Cruz‐Zavala et al, for instance).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of Lyapunov‐like conditions for ensuring dynamic systems to exhibit predefined‐time stability or predefined‐time boundedness, many predefined‐time controllers were designed for various systems, for example, nonlinear second‐order systems, 6‐8 nonholonomic systems, 9 chaotic systems, 10,11 rigid spacecrafts, 12 robotic manipulators 13,14 as well as first‐order and second‐order multi‐agent systems 15,16 . However, the predefined‐time controllers derived on the basis of Lyapunov analysis 3‐14 may provide conservative estimate of upper bounds of system convergence time, especially for high‐order systems. The real convergence time may be much smaller than the estimated upper bound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predefined‐time stability concept and its application in sliding mode control are discussed in References 25‐31. It is mentioned that, for a predefined‐time stable system, an upper bound for the convergence time exists, and such a bound can be defined a priori during the control design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%