2001
DOI: 10.1002/mrc.955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variable‐temperature high‐pressure investigation of the cobalt‐59 NMR spectroscopy of aqueous K3[Co(CN)6]

Abstract: Cobalt-59 NMR measurements were made on an aqueous solution of K 3 [Co. CN/ 6 ] with pressure as the main variable. We determined the effect of temperature and pressure (up to 5 kbar) on (i) the cobalt-59 chemical shift, (ii) the carbon-cobalt-59 isotope shift, (iii) the cobalt-59-carbon-13 coupling constant and (iv) the cobalt-59 spin-lattice relaxation time. The marked effects of temperature and pressure on the chemical shift can be attributed to changes in the cobalt-carbon bond distance and are consistent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The computed σ (Co) values in Table 1 exhibit a notable degree of variation, between about −5500 and −6800 ppm, largely following the mean CoC bond lengths. The longer this bond, the more deshielded is the metal nucleus 49. Even though they stem from different sources (equilibrium, effective, and ensemble‐averaged values with and without solvent or continuum), the r (CoC) and σ (Co) values from Table 1 show a good linear correlation (correlation coefficient 0.98) with a slope of −285 ppm pm −1 , very similar to the corresponding, actual shielding/bond‐length derivative in pristine 1 : ∂σ Co / ∂r CoC =−312 ppm pm −1 at the GIAO‐B3LYP/II′ level 17.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computed σ (Co) values in Table 1 exhibit a notable degree of variation, between about −5500 and −6800 ppm, largely following the mean CoC bond lengths. The longer this bond, the more deshielded is the metal nucleus 49. Even though they stem from different sources (equilibrium, effective, and ensemble‐averaged values with and without solvent or continuum), the r (CoC) and σ (Co) values from Table 1 show a good linear correlation (correlation coefficient 0.98) with a slope of −285 ppm pm −1 , very similar to the corresponding, actual shielding/bond‐length derivative in pristine 1 : ∂σ Co / ∂r CoC =−312 ppm pm −1 at the GIAO‐B3LYP/II′ level 17.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%