2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-2565(04)71550-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variables asociadas a la recuperación funcional y la institucionalización al alta en ancianos ingresados en una unidad geriátrica de media estancia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of using absolute gain, they defined achieving functional recovery as an improvement in BI score of at least 30% of the maximum possible improvement from the score at admission (e.g., BI at admission = 70 points, maximum achievable BI = 100 points, so BI at discharge = 80 points indicates a 33% improvement, i.e., functional recovery achieved) in order to avoid a ceiling effect. Other groups have considered an absolute gain of ≥20 points on the BI as indicating functional recovery in geriatric patients [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of using absolute gain, they defined achieving functional recovery as an improvement in BI score of at least 30% of the maximum possible improvement from the score at admission (e.g., BI at admission = 70 points, maximum achievable BI = 100 points, so BI at discharge = 80 points indicates a 33% improvement, i.e., functional recovery achieved) in order to avoid a ceiling effect. Other groups have considered an absolute gain of ≥20 points on the BI as indicating functional recovery in geriatric patients [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study includes sociodemographic variables (age and sex); variables related to the care process, such as hospitalization unit, type of process (medical, surgical), type of admission (scheduled, urgent), main diagnosis, Charlson Comorbidity Index [25,26], pressure injury on admission (yes, no), and admission motivated by fall (yes, no); outcome variables that necessitate nursing care, such as falls, pressure injuries, and functional loss [27]; the test to be evaluated (VALENF instrument) and the reference tests (Barthel Index [28], Braden Index [29] and Downton scale [30]).…”
Section: Variables and Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En este punto se ha documentado que los pacientes con una buena situación previa son 2,5 veces más susceptibles de recuperar su situación basal al alta; mientras que los pacientes que tienen un Barthel previo menor de 60 tienen mayor riesgo de deteriorarse durante la hospitalización y persistir con deterioro al egreso [11]. En este punto vale considerar el efecto suelo, el cual hace referencia a los pacientes que ingresan con una dependencia funcional muy severa y, por tanto, no pueden tener mayor deterioro durante la hospitalización.…”
Section: Factores De Riesgounclassified