2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2017.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variance analysis of robust state estimation in power system using influence function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The M -estimation based methods are effective in the presence of outliers [14], [15]. But they can hardly be implemented in a recursive manner [16], thus generally suffer from computational load problem because of batch implementation. However, among all the M -estimators the Least Absolute Value (LAV) estimator can be made computationally efficient by transforming into a linear programming problem.…”
Section: B Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The M -estimation based methods are effective in the presence of outliers [14], [15]. But they can hardly be implemented in a recursive manner [16], thus generally suffer from computational load problem because of batch implementation. However, among all the M -estimators the Least Absolute Value (LAV) estimator can be made computationally efficient by transforming into a linear programming problem.…”
Section: B Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The covariance of the state estimation error for the Mestimators in a dynamic system cannot be obtained easily. Previously in [16], [17] analytical equations for the covariance of the state estimation error of the M -estimator in a static system has been derived. The extension of the analytical covariance equation in [16], [17] to dynamic state estimation is not obvious.…”
Section: B Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is possible to list here some issues that have (and will continue to have) an impact on the SE function, namely: Different ways of processing corrupted measurements are topics of permanent interest in the SE development. Robust algorithms capable of further mitigating the influence of corrupted measurements—eg, promising algorithms based on the moving horizon strategy (sliding window of past measurements)—have been recently proposed. In addition, approaches that lead to the creation of algorithms competent in processing uncorrelated measurement residuals deserve further research. Various techniques, borrowed from the computer science field and applied to SE—based for instance on artificial intelligence, information theory, data integration, and evolutionary computing techniques—can integrate promising research directions. Deregulation of energy markets requires power companies to supervise their networks over vast areas, which entails the development of distributed (multi‐area) SE, aiming at the enhancement of the computational performance and reliability of the estimation process.…”
Section: Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimum match and the sensitivity levels in the range analysis are obtained by a small amount of calculations. This method ignores the inevitable errors in the test process [39,40]. And the variance analysis and significance check to judge the significance according to the F distribution function, will just make up for this deficiency.…”
Section: Pc Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%