2022
DOI: 10.1137/20m1361328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variance and Covariance of Distributions on Graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the entropy is maximum when ρ is a uniform distribution and then this can be understood as a measure of the diversity of ρ. Other possible metrics, like the diversity index [61], or different measures of variance on graphs [62], give qualitatively similar results. In the figure, we observe how varying m does indeed give place to different behaviours, with a higher level of uniformity obtained for larger values of the exponent.…”
Section: A Comparing Linear and Nonlinear Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Note that the entropy is maximum when ρ is a uniform distribution and then this can be understood as a measure of the diversity of ρ. Other possible metrics, like the diversity index [61], or different measures of variance on graphs [62], give qualitatively similar results. In the figure, we observe how varying m does indeed give place to different behaviours, with a higher level of uniformity obtained for larger values of the exponent.…”
Section: A Comparing Linear and Nonlinear Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…To take into account the complex structure of the network, we calculate the network variance 40 of originality and upvotes, using effective resistance 41 to estimate the distance between nodes—effective resistance is more robust to random graph fluctuations than the simple shortest path lengths, which can vary greatly with the addition/deletion of a single edge 40 . Network variance is high when original posts are scattered in the periphery, and it is low when they concentrate in the core.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affective polarization, which pertains to how people with different opinions interact with each other ( 11 ), is also of great interest as it is the one truly affecting the quality of online discourse. One way that we could approach affective polarization is via network covariance ( 52 ) and/or correlations ( 63 ), since affective polarization should manifest as a correlation on the edges. Specifically, one would look whether the sentiment of a relationship is correlated with the opinion difference between the two individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former is determined on the basis of social media users’ sharing behavior ( 34 , 51 ), and the latter is determined by downloading their connections such as, e.g., follower relationships on Twitter. We estimate the GE distance ( 24 , 52 ) between two opposing opinions across all the edges of the network. By doing so, we avoid using a local approach, and we do not assume a community structure by default.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%