2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10546-004-1986-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variance Method to Determine Turbulent Fluxes of Momentum And Sensible Heat in The Stable Atmospheric Surface Layer

Abstract: Abstract. Evidence is presented that in the stable atmospheric surface layer turbulent fluxes of heat and momentum can be determined from the standard deviations of longitudinal wind velocity and temperature, r u and r T respectively, measured at a single level. An attractive aspect of this method is that it yields fluxes from measurements that can be obtained with twodimensional sonic anemometers. These instruments are increasingly being used at official weather stations, where they replace the standard cup a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is seen that the e and C T 2 scaling performs well under these circumstances. De Bruin and Hartogensis (2005) show the same plot for the scaling of the standard deviation of temperature and longitudinal component of the wind speed, r T and r u , i.e. the variance method, which give less good results than the e and C T 2 scaling.…”
Section: Fluxes From E and C T 2 In Intermittent Turbulent Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is seen that the e and C T 2 scaling performs well under these circumstances. De Bruin and Hartogensis (2005) show the same plot for the scaling of the standard deviation of temperature and longitudinal component of the wind speed, r T and r u , i.e. the variance method, which give less good results than the e and C T 2 scaling.…”
Section: Fluxes From E and C T 2 In Intermittent Turbulent Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…, under neutral condition, shows a large scattering because T  and * T are both varying close to zero, and consequently the experimental accuracy is expected to be very low (Pahlow et al, 2001;De Bruin and Hartogensis, 2005). Another aspect that contributes to this the larger scattering is the temperature fluctuations associated to the thermal heterogeneities, which can exist even if the H is almost zero in a mean sense (Kader and Yaglom, 1990;Tsvang et al, 1998).…”
Section: A) Standard Deviation Of Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to accomplish the steady-state requirement for the calculation of covariances, a linear detrending routine was first applied to some of the scalar raw datasets (i.e. concentrations and temperature) (Goulden et al 1996;Rannik and Vesala 1999;Moncrieff et al 2004;De Bruin and Hartogensis 2005). As the used variables were recorded with different measurement systems, a time-lag correction was conducted to resynchronise the wind components and scalar variables if necessary, before calculating the covariances (Massman and Lee 2002;Foken 2006).…”
Section: Quality Verification Of the Eddy Covariance Datamentioning
confidence: 99%