2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2018.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variance of an anisotropic Bose-Einstein condensate

Abstract: The anisotropy of a trap potential can impact the density and variance of a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) in an opposite manner. We exemplify this effect for both the ground state and out-of-equilibrium dynamics of structureless bosons interacting by a long-range inter-particle interaction and trapped in a two-dimensional single-well potential. We demonstrate that even when the density of the BEC is, say, wider along the y direction and narrower along the x direction, its position variance can actually be sma… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, despite their small difference, the many-body and mean-field momentum variances do not cross each other, see Fig. 4 (contrast with the interaction-quench dynamics in a single trap in [18]).…”
Section: Bosons In An Annulus Subject To a Tiltmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, despite their small difference, the many-body and mean-field momentum variances do not cross each other, see Fig. 4 (contrast with the interaction-quench dynamics in a single trap in [18]).…”
Section: Bosons In An Annulus Subject To a Tiltmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, the many-body and mean-field variances do not cross each other, see Fig. 3, indicating that the dynamics is mild and sufficiently close to the ground state manifold of states (compare to [18] with interaction-quench dynamics in a single trap).…”
Section: Bosons In An Annulus Subject To a Tiltmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…x,density = 0.777, 0.748, 0.519 and 1 N ∆ 2 P X = ∆ 2 px,density = 0.329, 0.340, 0.482, whereas at the many-body level we find 1 N ∆ 2X = 0.781, 0.794, 0.927 and 1 N ∆ 2 P X = 0.328, 0.322, 0.272 for the three interactions parameters Λ = −0.018, −0.18, −1.8, respectively. Just like for their repulsive sibling [42,45,48], the variance and density in the ground state of an attractive trapped BEC behave in an opposite manner. In summary, increasing the attraction amounts to enlarging the position variance, despite narrowing of the density, in as much as increasing the repulsion [42,45,48] leads to decreasing of the position variance, in spite of broadening of the density.…”
Section: Ground Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction is quenched at t = 0 from Λ = λ 0 (N − 1) = −0.18 to Λ = −0.36. Following the quench of the interaction, the density performs breathing oscillations [45,48,[117][118][119]. The number of particles is N = 10, 100, .…”
Section: Out-of-equilibrium Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We solve the time-dependent many-boson Schrödinger equation presented in Eq. (1) using the MCTDHB method 36,39,40,49,57,58,61,[65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82] . The method is well documented and applied in the literature 59 .…”
Section: System and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%