1998
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(1998)124:11(1114)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variance of Load Estimates Derived by Piecewise Linear Interpolation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To calculate pesticide loss from the paddy field and fish pond, the volume of respective surface discharge in hourly resolution was multiplied by the corresponding pesticide concentration in the outflow. The hourly pesticide concentrations were estimated by a piecewise linear interpolation as described in Potter et al (2003) and Shih et al (1998). In a few cases, outflow concentration data were not available and field water concentrations were taken as a surrogate for field outlet concentrations, assuming homogeneous spatial distribution of pesticide concentrations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate pesticide loss from the paddy field and fish pond, the volume of respective surface discharge in hourly resolution was multiplied by the corresponding pesticide concentration in the outflow. The hourly pesticide concentrations were estimated by a piecewise linear interpolation as described in Potter et al (2003) and Shih et al (1998). In a few cases, outflow concentration data were not available and field water concentrations were taken as a surrogate for field outlet concentrations, assuming homogeneous spatial distribution of pesticide concentrations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimating uncertainty in load estimates for these three load methods can be complex, but is important for selecting the best method for a particular data set. For a period-weighted approach, the variance of a load estimate can be derived from a semivariogram calibrated to the data using a cross-validation technique (Shih et al 1998). For regression-model methods, the uncertainty in the regression is easy to calculate, but this can underestimate errors if the model calibration data set is not representative of all hydrologic conditions or model residuals are autocorrelated (Aulenbach 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface‐water samples typically are collected only once every k = 7 or 14 d. In practice, the predictions are often obtained by linearly imputing the gap days on the original scale (Shih et al, 1998; Stone et al, 2008; Richter et al, 2009), a method that corresponds to fitting a piecewise linear spline to the data, with knots at the sample data points. Several predictive watershed regression models based on historical pesticide monitoring data have been published (Larson and Gilliom, 2001; Chen et al, 2002; Guo et al, 2004; Chen, 2005; Vecchia et al, 2008; Stone et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%