2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variant and invariant predictors of perceived popularity across majority-Black and majority-White classrooms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
37
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that factors unique to the summer camp environment (e.g., a close-knit closed community, a central focus on developing and maintaining healthy friendships, an emphasis on addressing conflict respectfully) may inform a unique definition of popularity. Because there is evidence to suggest that conceptions of popularity may vary across numerous contextual factors (e.g., LaFontana & Cillessen, 2002;Lease et al, 2002;Meisinger, Blake, Lease, Palardy, & Olejnik, 2007), it would be interesting to see how pathways to popularity differ based on variability in definitions of popularity within the peer group. This finding highlights the necessity of examining peer relations across multiple social contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that factors unique to the summer camp environment (e.g., a close-knit closed community, a central focus on developing and maintaining healthy friendships, an emphasis on addressing conflict respectfully) may inform a unique definition of popularity. Because there is evidence to suggest that conceptions of popularity may vary across numerous contextual factors (e.g., LaFontana & Cillessen, 2002;Lease et al, 2002;Meisinger, Blake, Lease, Palardy, & Olejnik, 2007), it would be interesting to see how pathways to popularity differ based on variability in definitions of popularity within the peer group. This finding highlights the necessity of examining peer relations across multiple social contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, primary study analyses are multilevel (children nested within classrooms) and control for the key social behavior variables of peer‐perceived prosocial behavior, and relational and overt aggression. There are well‐established connections between these behaviors and social status (Cillessen & Rose, 2005; Cillessen et al., 2011), and additional evidence indicates that status–behavior associations may vary by individual ethnicity and classroom ethnic composition (Meisinger, Blake, Lease, Palardy, & Olejnik, 2007; Rodkin et al., 2000).…”
Section: Study Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this work provides critical evidence of the importance of injunctive norms to adolescent substance use, “approval” may not be the most salient concept for this age group, as the word alludes to judgments of safe, appropriate or adult-sanctioned behavior, and young adolescents are at a stage when questioning authority, rebelling and forging one's own identity are basic developmental tasks. “Coolness,” in contrast, is a construct reflecting youth culture; it is generally viewed as a desirable characteristic and associated with popularity (especially among boys) (Closson 2008; Meisinger et al 2007), and it peaks in importance during early adolescence (LaFontana and Cillessen 2010). Although direct comparisons of the importance of coolness and approval (or other value expectancies) are not available, the youth focus of “coolness” may be a more relevant behavior motivator in this age group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%