2021
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.6197-20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variant Angina with Spontaneously Documented Ischemia- and Tachycardia-induced "Lambda" Waves

Abstract: In a patient with variant angina of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, myocardial ischemia changed the QRS-ST-T configurations without J-waves into those resembling "lambda" waves at maximal ST-segment elevation, and couplets or triplets of supraventricular extrasystole (SVE) changed the ischemia-induced "lambda" waves into QRS-ST-T configurations resembling a "tombstone" morphology or "monophasic QRS-ST complex." At the resolution phase of coronary spasm, the QRS-ST-T configurations return… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10] In our patient, PACs with multiple patterns of aberrant conduction, including LAFB alone, RBBB plus LPFB, RBBB plus LPFB and LSFB, were spontaneously documented and were not by an experiment. Moreover, Kulbertus et al also pointed out that some patterns of aberrant conduction could not be readily classified into the usual categories of intraventricular conduction defects, [10][11][12] despite being obviously different in shape from the control (Figs. 2 and 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10] In our patient, PACs with multiple patterns of aberrant conduction, including LAFB alone, RBBB plus LPFB, RBBB plus LPFB and LSFB, were spontaneously documented and were not by an experiment. Moreover, Kulbertus et al also pointed out that some patterns of aberrant conduction could not be readily classified into the usual categories of intraventricular conduction defects, [10][11][12] despite being obviously different in shape from the control (Figs. 2 and 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%