Variant product configuration of industrial air handling units in a MTO environment

Custódio, Douglas Togni; Vaccaro, Guilherme Luís Roehe; Nunes, Fabiano de Lima; Vidor, Gabriel; Chiwiacowsky, Leonardo Dagnino

doi:10.1007/s00170-017-1171-7

Cited by 10 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In order-based manufacturing environments, such as make-to-order (Claycomb et al , 2005; Custódio et al , 2018), build-to-order (Brabazon et al , 2010; Engelhardt-Nowitzki, 2012) and engineer-to-order (Wadhwa and Rao, 2000; Levandowski et al , 2015), production activity could start only after orders are received. Make-to-order/Build-to-order represents the finished product manufacture once the customer places a sales order, while in Engineer-to-order the customer defines practically all the product characteristics.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Make-to-order/Build-to-order significantly increases the flexibility level in supply chain and reduces finished product inventory levels and manufacturing time (Claycomb et al , 2005). This manufacturing strategy can bring significant benefits in terms of reduced lead times and inventory holdings, allowing companies to achieve flexibility in adapting to market volatility (Brabazon et al , 2010; Engelhardt-Nowitzki, 2012; Custódio et al , 2018). In Engineer-to-order, production flexibility is scalable and aspects related to cycle times, production costs, quality and higher MP levels could be managed along the supply chain (Wadhwa and Rao, 2000; Levandowski et al , 2015).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Supply chain flexibility and mass personalization: a systematic literature review

Novais

Marín

Bruque

2019

JBIM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This paper aims to explore the current state of research on supply chain flexibility (SCF) and mass personalization (MP) to identify the literature findings to date, research gaps and to provide guidelines for future research in this area. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review of 64 papers was undertaken to address the use of SCF as a productive response to MP environments. The methodology used is made up of five steps: formulation of the research questions, identification of studies, selection and evaluation of studies, analysis and synthesis and presentation of the results. Findings Three main research topics have been identified: personalization levels and flexible processes in supply chain, where flexible processes in supply chain are analysed as a productive response to high levels of MP; supply chain collaborative processes for SCF and MP, where product co-creation and relationships between supply chain members is analysed; and SCF and MP enabling technologies, in which technologies to support MP implementation and SCF are considered. Each of these three main topics have been divided into research lines and research sublines that allowed identifying a positive relationship between the SCF and the MP strategies. Research limitations/implications Systematic literature review is a methodology reliable and recommended by a large number of scientific papers. However, it depends on available and accessible research studies and the researcher’s criteria. The selection of certain criteria for inclusion and exclusion of papers introduces publication bias, which should be considered an intrinsic limitation to systematic literature review. Originality/value The main literature findings in each research line and subline related to the SCF-MP relationship are identified and analysed. Furthermore, research gaps and further research lines in the SCF-MP area are highlighted. The information presented in this paper improves the literature on the advances in the SCF use as a productive response to MP environments.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Supply chain flexibility and mass personalization: a systematic literature review

Novais

Marín

Bruque

2019

JBIM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Generally, a fixed and a variable area of product structure can be identified, in which mandatory and optional spaces are foreseen for individual implementation. Product customization is usually supported by configuration systems (Custódio et al, 2018). Integration of risk management supporting methods like FMEA is also possible.…”

Section: Product Lifecycle Management (Plm)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Product customization is usually supported by configuration systems (Custódio et al, 2018). Integration of risk management supporting methods like FMEA is also possible.…”

Section: Product Lifecycle Management (Plm)mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Method to Explore Product Risk in Product Lifecycle Management of Configured Products

Castaneda

Ostrosi

Majić

et al. 2020

Proc. Des. Soc.: Des. Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Today high quality and low product development turnaround time are company-wide priorities. Quality supporting processes such as an effective risk management system shall support continuous business running and meeting the goals of an organization. In this paper, an approach is presented on how to integrate the product risk management in Product Lifecycle Management for configured products by definition of an additional software module and its implementation.

show abstract

“…Product customization is usually supported by configuration systems. Generic conceptual procedures for designing such a system are important for mass customization [23]. These procedures involve analysis and redesign of the business processes, analysis and modelling of the company's product portfolio, selection of configuration software, programming of the software, and implementation and further development of the configuration system towards Product-Service System (PSS).…”

Section: Product Lifecycle Management (Plm)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Modular Approach to Technical Risk Management in Product Lifecycle Management

Castaneda¹,

Majić²,

Ostrosi³

et al. 2019

Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current trend in product development is toward usage and integration of different advanced technologies which are increasingly embedded in a comprehensive PDM system as a company-wide information back-bone. With such an approach, the transparency is increased and many business processes accelerated. While modularization is a mega-trend, the modular approach is also used to align development processes with the workflows in PDM. The goal of an effective risk management system is to allow continuous business running and achieving the goals of an organization. In order to achieve this, it is necessary, as far as it is possible, to identify and to analyze risks the organization is confronting and to evaluate their effects on the business. In this paper, an approach is presented on how to integrate the technical risk management in Product Lifecycle Management by definition of an additional software module and its implementation.

show abstract

Variant product configuration of industrial air handling units in a MTO environment

Cited by 10 publications

References 38 publications

Supply chain flexibility and mass personalization: a systematic literature review

Supply chain flexibility and mass personalization: a systematic literature review

A Method to Explore Product Risk in Product Lifecycle Management of Configured Products

Modular Approach to Technical Risk Management in Product Lifecycle Management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About