The guiding question of this paper is how
(horizontal) connections are established when new items enter the
network of constructions. It presents a quantitative, corpus-based
study of the development of to-contraction (e.g.
want to > wanna) in American English since
the 19th century. From a plethora of earlier forms, gonna,
wanna and gotta emerge, first as
representations of phonetic reduction, but in time claiming their
place as newly emerged, separate nodes in the constructional
network. As their frequency increases, their usage patterns
(relative to the full form) become increasingly similar. I propose
that this marks the emergence of a horizontal link, which can be
described as an emerging “metaconstruction”. The study discusses
the status of these forms as either phonetic variants, potential
allostructions, or independent form–meaning pairings, and provides
first-hand evidence for emergent connections via mechanisms of
analogy in language. Moreover, it makes an argument that (changing)
usage patterns reflect (changing) constructional links and degrees
of entrenchment.