2016 IEEE International Test Conference (ITC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/test.2016.7805845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation and failure characterization through pattern classification of test data from multiple test stages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shift undermines the effectiveness of a simple stuck-at based test solution. Data-based classification algorithms have improved continuously with the change of defects, minimize yield loss [11,12,13,14,15,16,17], ML can be used to distinguish between marginal defects and process variation defects based on circuit delay, depend on different delay distribution. The classification results can be able to locate the defects and identify the root cause.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This shift undermines the effectiveness of a simple stuck-at based test solution. Data-based classification algorithms have improved continuously with the change of defects, minimize yield loss [11,12,13,14,15,16,17], ML can be used to distinguish between marginal defects and process variation defects based on circuit delay, depend on different delay distribution. The classification results can be able to locate the defects and identify the root cause.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we can see, most of previous works are based on conventional fault models [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18], lack of research on marginal defects and process variation defects with machine learning classification methods. To bridge this gap and formally show that, in a quest to reduce ELF and increase reliability, the work presented in this paper combines the concepts of regression and KNN algorithm with data preprocessing method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%