2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02556.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in adult sex ratio alters the association between courtship, mating frequency and paternity in the lek‐forming fruitfly Ceratitis capitata

Abstract: The intensity with which males deliver courtship and the frequency with which they mate are key components of male reproductive success. However, we expect the strength of the relationship between these traits and a male’s overall paternity to be strongly context dependent, for example to be altered significantly by the extent of post‐mating competition. We tested this prediction in a lekking insect, Ceratitis capitata (medfly). We examined the effect of manipulating the sex ratio from male‐ to female‐biased (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, at male-biased ASR, rates of aggression increase; males harass females, which in turn induces increased female mortality [14]. Moreover, in species with male-biased ASR, courtship behaviour and male-male competition intensify [15,16], and/or males are more likely to provide care for their young than at female-biased ASRs [5,13,17]. Furthermore, ASR is a significant predictor of sex roles: birds with female-biased (or even) ASR typically exhibit conventional sex roles whereby males compete for females and females look after the young, whereas species with malebiased ASR often exhibit sex role reversal: males care for the young, whereas females compete for access to males [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, at male-biased ASR, rates of aggression increase; males harass females, which in turn induces increased female mortality [14]. Moreover, in species with male-biased ASR, courtship behaviour and male-male competition intensify [15,16], and/or males are more likely to provide care for their young than at female-biased ASRs [5,13,17]. Furthermore, ASR is a significant predictor of sex roles: birds with female-biased (or even) ASR typically exhibit conventional sex roles whereby males compete for females and females look after the young, whereas species with malebiased ASR often exhibit sex role reversal: males care for the young, whereas females compete for access to males [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Wiklund and Kaitala ; Pitnick and García‐González ; Leftwich et al. ). Our new results here show that there are different determinants underpinning the responses of both traits to variation in maternal effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, with male‐biased ASR, the courtship behavior and male–male competition may intensify (Leftwich et al. ); a male‐biased ASR may also increase the rates of aggression and harassment of males to females, which in turn resulting in higher mortality of females (Le Galliard et al. ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASR has critical effects on behavior, mate competition and life history and has implications for population demography and biodiversity conservation (Le Galliard et al 2005;Kokko and Jennions 2008;Liker et al 2013;Szekely et al 2014a;Pipoly et al 2015). For example, with male-biased ASR, the courtship behavior and male-male competition may intensify (Leftwich et al 2012); a male-biased ASR may also increase the rates of aggression and harassment of males to females, which in turn resulting in higher mortality of females (Le Galliard et al 2005). ASR varies widely among species, ranging from highly male-biased populations to those composed only of adult females (Donald 2007;Szekely et al 2014b), and variation across spatial-temporal scales for different populations of a given species (McKellar et al 2009;Reichard et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%