2008
DOI: 10.1080/01431160802282862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in atmospheric ozone concentration following strong earthquakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing trends in tropospheric ozone residual (TOR) measurements over the Indian inland cities are reported by Kulkarni et al (2010). Ganguly (2009) also observed overall increasing ozone trends (1.2-7 %) over the Indian forests for the period 1980-2000. Using Ozone Mapping Instrument measurements Nishanth and Satheesh (2011) reported increasing ozone trends *8.8 %/year over the Indian coastal cities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Increasing trends in tropospheric ozone residual (TOR) measurements over the Indian inland cities are reported by Kulkarni et al (2010). Ganguly (2009) also observed overall increasing ozone trends (1.2-7 %) over the Indian forests for the period 1980-2000. Using Ozone Mapping Instrument measurements Nishanth and Satheesh (2011) reported increasing ozone trends *8.8 %/year over the Indian coastal cities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The variations of ozone concentration after the earthquakes showed a similar trend. The ozone concentration was low on the day of the earthquake occurrence, increased gradually after the event and reached a maximum value and thereafter decreased to its normal value (Ganguly, 2009;Singh et al, 2007). In addition, increases of CO concentration deduced from Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) occurred prior to the 26 January 2001 Gujarat M s = 7.6 earthquake (Singh et al, 2010a), the 15 January 2001 Taiwan M s = 7.5 earthquake (Guo et al, 2006), the 6 June 2000 Jingtai M s = 5.9 earthquake in Gansu Province, northwestern China (Yao et al, 2005) and the M s = 6.9 earthquake of 8 June 2000 in northern Myanmar (Yao et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The experiments indicated that different igneous and metamorphic rocks produced Moreover, the anomaly of O 3 concentration can be caused by the transport of enriched-O 3 air from higher latitudes. Advection of gaseous compounds of nitrogen oxides (NO x ) from the neighboring high-pressure regions where the earthquake occurred and the atmospheric pressure is intensively low may contribute to the anomalies of O 3 concentration (Ganguly, 2009). Meanwhile, the heat energy can be transmitted from the surface to the upper layers during the process of earthquake activities in the region of low atmospheric pressure that was created by gravity waves (Pal, 2002).…”
Section: Anomalies Of O 3 Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Geologists maintained that there is no connection between weather and earthquakes. But several recent studies (Singh et al, 2010b;Ganguly, 2009) reported that changes in surface, atmosphere and gases like ozone are associated with earthquakes. Surface and air temperature, RH and surface latent heat flux changes showed complementary nature one day prior to the earthquake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%