2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in compressive and flexural strength of the carbon epoxy composites with the addition of various fillers to the epoxy resin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing these results with other studies, it was observed that there is concordance such as those reported by Bruscato et al (2019), who obtained data between 300 and 350 kg/m 3 , other authors report densities between 57 and 209 kg/m 3 (Holt et al, 2012;López Nava et al, 2016) Exhibit 7A and B shows the trend of the fracture values of the material at maximum stress that varies for each replicate and treatment, evidencing that the matrix does not have sufficient strength. This behavior is due to the arrangement of the fibers within the composite material (Chandramohan, 2020) as well as to the low internal and heterogeneous growth of the mycelium due to the possible lack of air and available moisture between the fibers, making the material nonuniform and brittle. It is worth noting that at T50 a brittle behavior is evidence that does not prevent the material from breaking, some studies have reported that the thickness of the mushroom skin influences this mechanical property (Appels et al, 2019).…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When comparing these results with other studies, it was observed that there is concordance such as those reported by Bruscato et al (2019), who obtained data between 300 and 350 kg/m 3 , other authors report densities between 57 and 209 kg/m 3 (Holt et al, 2012;López Nava et al, 2016) Exhibit 7A and B shows the trend of the fracture values of the material at maximum stress that varies for each replicate and treatment, evidencing that the matrix does not have sufficient strength. This behavior is due to the arrangement of the fibers within the composite material (Chandramohan, 2020) as well as to the low internal and heterogeneous growth of the mycelium due to the possible lack of air and available moisture between the fibers, making the material nonuniform and brittle. It is worth noting that at T50 a brittle behavior is evidence that does not prevent the material from breaking, some studies have reported that the thickness of the mushroom skin influences this mechanical property (Appels et al, 2019).…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The property of pure epoxy with fibre is poor, exhibiting low stiffness and decreased mechanical properties. The laminate's compressive and flexural strength can be dominant by adding additives or fillers to the resin at varying percentages [1]. CFRP results in a very elevated strength-to-weight ratio and makes it exceedingly rigid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Composite materials are a mixture of two or more distinct materials constituting matrix and reinforcement. In comparison with many metals and non-metals, mechanical properties such as combination of strength, stiffness, toughness, and corrosion resistance are significantly found in composites (Chandramohan, 2020;Singh et al, 2013;Tsao & Chiu, 2011). Fiber-reinforced polymer composites involving fiber phase provide strength to the composite, whereas the reinforcement phase absorbs energy resulting in increase in toughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%