2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4866962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in daytime troposphereic aerosol via LIDAR and sunphotometer measurements in Penang, Malaysia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The underand overpredicted AOD were examined using a Raymetrics LIDAR system if the data were available. Our LIDAR system is co-located with the Cimel sunphotometer at the rooftop Tan et al (2013Tan et al ( , 2014c. The LIDAR signals were pre-analyzed based on the protocol mentioned in Tan et al (2013Tan et al ( , 2014c.…”
Section: Methodology and Statistical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The underand overpredicted AOD were examined using a Raymetrics LIDAR system if the data were available. Our LIDAR system is co-located with the Cimel sunphotometer at the rooftop Tan et al (2013Tan et al ( , 2014c. The LIDAR signals were pre-analyzed based on the protocol mentioned in Tan et al (2013Tan et al ( , 2014c.…”
Section: Methodology and Statistical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5 indicates that most of the predicted AOD values are lower than the measured counterparts. Tan et al (2014c) analyze the underprediction in these values. They used a LI-DAR system to determine the vertical profile of aerosols in Penang and found that the aerosol concentration decreased with height up to the planetary boundary layer (PBL).…”
Section: Validation Of the Predicted Aodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When LIDAR data were available for examination, only the data that can clearly elucidate the under-and over-predicted AOD were selected. The LIDAR signals were pre-analyzed based on the published works of Tan et al (2013Tan et al ( , 2014c. The backscatter coefficients of the aerosol from LIDAR signals were determined using the method of Fernald (1984).…”
Section: Methodology and Statistical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure indicates that most of the predicted AOD values were lower than the measured counterparts. Tan et al (2014c) analyzed the underprediction in these values. They used a LIDAR system to determine the vertical profile of aerosols in Penang and found that the aerosol concentration decreased with height up to the planetary boundary layer (PBL).…”
Section: Validation Of the Predicted Aodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, extensive measurement campaigns have taken place to establish aerosol sources and transport [8,18,19]. Nevertheless, in Malaysia, observations are still scarce [20,21] and for a limited amount of time. During monsoonal seasons, November to March and from June to September [22], biomass burning emissions increase [1,2] in SEA neighbor countries around Malaysia, and Pulau Pinang experiences strong hazy atmospheric conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%