2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10806-011-9355-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in Emotion and Cognition Among Fishes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
46
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to phylogenetic relationship, social proximity and cultural narratives, the needs of mammals and birds appear to be more accessible and comprehensible to humans, than this is the case with finfish or aquatic invertebrates (Braithwaite et al 2013;Röcklinsberg 2014;Joy 2013, 72-76). 9 While the negative effects of inadequate stocking densities in mammals and birds are often clearly visible (e.g.…”
Section: Stocking Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to phylogenetic relationship, social proximity and cultural narratives, the needs of mammals and birds appear to be more accessible and comprehensible to humans, than this is the case with finfish or aquatic invertebrates (Braithwaite et al 2013;Röcklinsberg 2014;Joy 2013, 72-76). 9 While the negative effects of inadequate stocking densities in mammals and birds are often clearly visible (e.g.…”
Section: Stocking Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Röcklinsberg 2014). With regard to fish, there is consensus that they are sentient beings and do feel pain (Braithwaite et al 2013). This cannot be said about invertebrates in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many interesting studies have been published discussing the possibility of fish have nociceptors (reflex to a noxious stimulus) , and not only perceive the pain (Sneddon, 2011), but whether fish have emotions, and if so how they experience them (Braithwaite, Huntingford, & Bos, 2013;Kittilsen, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a set of behaviours that show variation across coping styles traits are correlated to show intra-individual consistency and the different behavioural responses also show intra-individual consistency across time and in different context (predation, confinement, environmental variations, among others) Braithwaite et al, 2011), the set of behaviours is considered a behavioural syndrome Reale et al, 2007;Wolf and Weissing, 2012). One behavioural syndrome is proactive-reactive stress coping style axis (Koolhaas et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some researchers demonstrated that proactive fish tended to possess a higher immune reaction (MacKenzie et al, 2009;Rey et al, 2016), higher growth rates (Millot et al, 2009), and higher reproductive success (Godin and Dugatkin, 1996), however, showed lower anti-predatory responses than reactive fish (Huntingford et al, 2010). Physiologically, proactive fish have a lower activity at hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal/interrenal (HPI) level, which affects the stress response to different stressors, presenting lower post-stress levels of glucocorticoids, which may be broadly classified to affect two major categories, immunological and metabolic response Braithwaite et al, 2011). Different SCS classifications (proactive, reactive) related to behavioural and physiological SCS have been defined in a wide range of fish species such as, rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (Øverli et al, 2002; Øverli et al, 2006), brown trout (Salmo trutta) (Kristiansen, 1999;Brelin et al, 2005), zebrafish (Danio rerio) Tudorache et al, 2013;Tudorache et al, 2015), African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) (Martins et al, 2005;2006) and include flatfish, halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) (Kristiansen et al, 2004;Kristiansen and Fernö, 2007), olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) (Rupia et al, 2016) and Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis) Ibarra-Zatarain et al, 2015;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%