2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00435-020-00480-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in external morphology between the native and invasive populations of the round goby, Neogobius melanostomus (Actinopterygii: Gobiidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such probes are commonly designed using simplified shapes of fish and do not account for the individual morphological characteristics of specific species. Variations in the morphology of fish have been shown to be directly related to swimming costs (Ohlberger et al, 2006), and several studies reported morphological adaptations in fish from riverine habitats (Dashinov et al, 2020; Franssen et al, 2013; Imre, 2002; Meyers & Belk, 2014). Thus, the force measurements accounted for the individual body shapes and provided a species‐oriented assessment of the flow field near a vertical slot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such probes are commonly designed using simplified shapes of fish and do not account for the individual morphological characteristics of specific species. Variations in the morphology of fish have been shown to be directly related to swimming costs (Ohlberger et al, 2006), and several studies reported morphological adaptations in fish from riverine habitats (Dashinov et al, 2020; Franssen et al, 2013; Imre, 2002; Meyers & Belk, 2014). Thus, the force measurements accounted for the individual body shapes and provided a species‐oriented assessment of the flow field near a vertical slot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters consistent with normal distribution were subjected to one-way ANOVA. For the parameters that were not normally distributed, difference in means between populations were assessed using ANOVA after testing for non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA on ranks (Dashinov et al 2020). Similarly, T-test and non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare whether the two sexes signi cantly different in the morphological parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cross-validation test was computed to assess the ability of variables to discriminate P. clarkii populations (Konan et al 2010;Freire et al 2017;Dashinov et al 2020). After the cross-validation procedure, there was 58.82% of both sexes of P. clarkii were correctly classi ed in their groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of stepwise and canonical analysis is an effective method for grouping and distinguishing species and populations from different taxa [56–59]. Despite a significant degree of overlap in morphometric data (Figs 4 and 5), canonical discriminant analyses identified two main groups based on cyst morphometric measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%