2016
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in growth of Damaraland mole-rats is explained by competition rather than by functional specialization for different tasks

Abstract: In some eusocial insect societies, adaptation to the division of labour results in multimodal size variation among workers. It has been suggested that variation in size and growth among non-breeders in naked and Damaraland mole-rats may similarly reflect functional divergence associated with different cooperative tasks. However, it is unclear whether individual growth rates are multimodally distributed (as would be expected if variation in growth is associated with specialization for different tasks) or whethe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies on wild and captive Damaraland mole-rats have shown that males require more time than females to reach maximum body mass (Young et al 2015;Zöttl et al 2016a). These results would account for the differences in growth rates between the sexes in our study, where it appears wild males continue gaining body mass at a greater rate than females even after obtaining reproductive tenure.…”
Section: R a F Tsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent studies on wild and captive Damaraland mole-rats have shown that males require more time than females to reach maximum body mass (Young et al 2015;Zöttl et al 2016a). These results would account for the differences in growth rates between the sexes in our study, where it appears wild males continue gaining body mass at a greater rate than females even after obtaining reproductive tenure.…”
Section: R a F Tsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Individuals >20 g were implanted with a subcutaneous transponder tag (Dorset Group, Aalten, The Netherlands) to uniquely identify them. Captured mole-rats were housed up to 10 days at 20-25 °C in artificial tunnel systems made from polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes with a plastic box filled with paper towels replicating a nest and provided with sweet potato and gemsbok cucumber ad libitum (Zöttl et al 2016a). After the last individual was captured we waited up to 48 hours to ensure no other individuals were present then released the group into their burrow.…”
Section: R a F Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some species where average kinship between group members is high and traits associated with organisational complexity are present (including naked mole rats [ Heterocephalus glaber, Rüppell 1842] and Kalahari meerkats [ Suricata suricatta, Schreber 1776]), there are also obvious morphological differences between breeding and non‐breeding females which resemble those between queens and workers in eusocial insects, although they are less pronounced (Bennett & Faulkes ; Clutton‐Brock ; Zöttl et al . ). While high levels of average kinship in social groups of these species mean that individuals direct costly forms of cooperative behaviour almost exclusively at close kin (Griffin & West ), individual differences in contributions to alloparental care within social groups are seldom closely associated with variation in relatedness between helpers and the individuals that they are assisting (Clutton‐Brock ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…When males joined an established group, it was more likely that the reproductive individual of the same sex went missing than when females joined a group. This may explain shorter tenures of reproduction in males, larger body size of males and lower reproductive skew in lifetime reproductive success among males than among females (Young & Bennett, ; Zöttl et al ., ; Finn et al ., ). These results combined suggest that philopatric females may sometimes have access to unrelated males (Bennett & Faulkes, ; Young & Bennett, ), which is also consistent with the genetic structure of wild Damaraland mole‐rats (Burland et al ., ) and the closely related Ansell's mole‐rat ( Fukomys anselli , Šklíba et al ., ; Patzenhauerova et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%