2011
DOI: 10.1177/1040638711407881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation inBluetongue virusreal-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay results in blood samples of sheep, cattle, and alpaca

Abstract: Abstract. Bluetongue is a vector-borne viral disease that affects domestic and wild ruminants. The epidemiology of this disease has recently changed, with occurrence in new geographic areas. Various real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (real-time qRT-PCR) assays are used to detect Bluetongue virus (BTV); however, the impact of biologic differences between New World camelids and domestic ruminant samples on PCR efficiency, for which the BTV real-time qRT-PCR was initially valid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nucleic acid extraction methods must be evaluated for the animal source (Brito et al 2011) and the specimen chosen (Vanbinst et al 2010). EDTA blood represents the most common sample type for molecular detection of BTV (MacLachlan et al 2009); however, PCR inhibitors, such as immunoglobulin G and hemoglobin, can have significant negative effects on the sensitivity of RT-PCR-based tests (Al-Soud and Radstrom 2001).…”
Section: Nucleic Acid Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nucleic acid extraction methods must be evaluated for the animal source (Brito et al 2011) and the specimen chosen (Vanbinst et al 2010). EDTA blood represents the most common sample type for molecular detection of BTV (MacLachlan et al 2009); however, PCR inhibitors, such as immunoglobulin G and hemoglobin, can have significant negative effects on the sensitivity of RT-PCR-based tests (Al-Soud and Radstrom 2001).…”
Section: Nucleic Acid Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past couple of decades, alpacas have gained significant popularity as pets, show animals, and fiber animals in the United States, with a total of 264,587 alpacas registered in the US as of May 2019 [14]. A variety of viruses have been identified in alpacas, including bovine viral diarrhea virus, coronavirus, adenovirus, equine viral arteritis virus, rotavirus, rabies, bluetongue virus, foot-and-mouth disease virus, bovine respiratory syncytial virus, influenza A virus, bovine papillomavirus, vesicular stomatitis virus, parainfluenza-3 virus, West Nile virus, and equine herpesvirus [12,15,16,17,18,19,20]. However, BoVs have yet to be reported in alpacas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%