Humans prefer to live within their thermal comfort or neutral zone, which they create by making shelters, wearing clothing, and more recently, by regulating their ambient temperature. This allows humans to maintain a constant core temperature with minimal energy expenditure, a trait that is conserved across all endotherms, including mammals and birds. Although this primordial drive leads us to seek thermal comfort, we house our experimental subjects, laboratory mice (Mus musculus), under thermal stress conditions. Here we discuss how housing mice below their thermoneutral zone limits our ability to model and study human diseases. Using examples from cardiovascular physiology, metabolic disorders, infections, and tumor immunology, we point out that certain phenotypes observed under thermal stress conditions disappear when mice are housed at thermoneutrality, whereas others emerge that are more consistent with human biology. Thus, we propose that warming the mouse might allow for more predictive modeling of human diseases and therapies.