2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in perioperative cerebral and hemodynamic monitoring during carotid endarterectomy

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a recent study has shown a variety of monitoring strategies used across different centres in The Netherlands, including awake surgery, EEG, TCD, stump pressure measurement and no monitoring due to routine shunting in all patients. Only 56% of the interviewed centres reported the combined use of EEG and TCD [ 17 ]. This study indicates that, although the pitfalls of each monitoring method are generally well-known, the use of combined monitoring is not yet common practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a recent study has shown a variety of monitoring strategies used across different centres in The Netherlands, including awake surgery, EEG, TCD, stump pressure measurement and no monitoring due to routine shunting in all patients. Only 56% of the interviewed centres reported the combined use of EEG and TCD [ 17 ]. This study indicates that, although the pitfalls of each monitoring method are generally well-known, the use of combined monitoring is not yet common practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%