Objective
The examination to determine if a veteran has service-connected posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) affects veterans’ lives for years afterwards. This study examined factors potentially associated with veterans’ perception of their examination’s quality.
Methods
Three hundred eighty-four veterans participated in a clinical trial in which they received either a semi-structured interview or the examiner’s usual interview. Immediately after the interview, veterans completed confidential ratings of the examination’s quality and of their examiners’ interpersonal qualities and competence. Extensive data characterizing the veterans, the 33 participating examiners, and the examinations themselves were collected.
Results
Forty-seven percent of Caucasian veterans versus 34% of African American veterans rated their examination quality as “excellent.” In multivariate analysis, African Americans were less likely than Caucasians to assign a higher quality rating (odds ratio .61, 95% confidence interval .38 – .99). African Americans also rated their examiners as having significantly worse interpersonal qualities but not lower competence. Ratings were not significantly related to the veterans' age, gender, marital status, eventual diagnosis with PTSD, Global Assessment of Functioning score, the examiners’ perception of the prevalence of malingering, or the presence of a third party in the examination.
Conclusions
Ratings of disability examinations were generally high, although African American veterans' ratings were less favorable than Caucasian veterans' ratings.