2003
DOI: 10.1007/s000400300008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in propensity to defend by reproductive gall morphs in two species of gall-forming thrips

Abstract: Six species of Australian phleaothripine gall forming thrips on Acacia have two morphs. One morph, referred to as a soldier, has reduced antennae and wings and greatly enlarged fore femora, which are thought to be adaptations for gall defence. For most species, female soldier morphs have reduced reproductive output relative to dispersing females and these species have been regarded as eusocial. We examine defensive behaviour of soldier morphs using in situ presentation of gall invading kleptoparasites. We show… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These outcomes further eroded the idea that forelimb morphology is linked strongly to the soldiers' role in gall defence. While our experiments could not address previous findings that soldiers showed little proclivity to engage the enemy [4], this behaviour, in the context of our data, suggested that, although soldiers clearly repel other insect invaders, their apparent reluctance to engage one kind of enemy may be because resources are allocated to fight another: micro-organisms. This is supported by the antimicrobial assays, which show that soldiers strongly suppress fungal growth and, significantly, can do so at much lower densities than dispersers.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…These outcomes further eroded the idea that forelimb morphology is linked strongly to the soldiers' role in gall defence. While our experiments could not address previous findings that soldiers showed little proclivity to engage the enemy [4], this behaviour, in the context of our data, suggested that, although soldiers clearly repel other insect invaders, their apparent reluctance to engage one kind of enemy may be because resources are allocated to fight another: micro-organisms. This is supported by the antimicrobial assays, which show that soldiers strongly suppress fungal growth and, significantly, can do so at much lower densities than dispersers.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, other species induce small galls within which the foundress lays only a few eggs, and these give rise to wingless adults of both sexes with enlarged forelegs and prothorax. These wingless adults function as soldiers, fighting to protect their gall from invading caterpillars and kleptoparasitic thrips (Crespi & Abbot 1999;Perry et al 2002), and in some species the females have reduced reproductive capacity Chapman et al 2002).…”
Section: Evolution Host-utilisation and Structural Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soldiers themselves appear to make an additional trade-off. Thus, the reproductive output of thrips soldiers ranges widely , and soldier defensive efficacy appears to be negatively correlated with the degree to which soldiers reproduce (r = −0.88, P = 0.0489, N = 5 by simple correlation; r= − 0.84, P = 0.076 using independent contrasts, Perry et al 2002Perry et al , 2004. Given evidence for a relationship between soldier reproduction and defensive ability, the mechanism and source of the trade-off remain unclear.…”
Section: Soldier Defensive Abilitymentioning
confidence: 90%