2007
DOI: 10.1080/00140130601138585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in sitting pressure distribution and location of the points of maximum pressure with rotation of the pelvis, gender and body characteristics

Abstract: The pressure distribution and the location of the points of maximum pressure, usually below the ischial tuberosities, was measured for subjects sitting on a flat, hard and horizontal support, and varying angle of the rotation of the pelvis. The pressure data were analyzed for force-and pressure-related quantities. Multiple regression was applied to explore relationships between these quantities and (i) a set of body characteristics, and (ii) the pelvis rotation. The maximum pressure and the pressure gradient w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The predicted shapes were used to create solid finite element models (FEMs). The solid FEMS were used to validate the constitutive equations by comparing computed pressure distribution knowledge (Moes and Horváth, 2002b) with measured pressure distribution knowledge (Moes, 2006) for individual humans, or groups of individuals, when sitting in chairs. Therefore, the multi-dimensional digital human model was used to analyse the relationships between the stresses and strains inside the bodies of individual humans, or groups of individual humans, and the shapes of chairs, based on actual measured knowledge, and the results were used to create virtual models of the optimised chairs (Moes, 2004).…”
Section: The Initial Implementation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predicted shapes were used to create solid finite element models (FEMs). The solid FEMS were used to validate the constitutive equations by comparing computed pressure distribution knowledge (Moes and Horváth, 2002b) with measured pressure distribution knowledge (Moes, 2006) for individual humans, or groups of individuals, when sitting in chairs. Therefore, the multi-dimensional digital human model was used to analyse the relationships between the stresses and strains inside the bodies of individual humans, or groups of individual humans, and the shapes of chairs, based on actual measured knowledge, and the results were used to create virtual models of the optimised chairs (Moes, 2004).…”
Section: The Initial Implementation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moes [27] explored the relationships between interface pressure, pelvic rotation, and body characteristics of 19 able-bodied participants. Through multiple regression techniques it was shown that intrinsic characteristics including ectomorphic index, gender, mass, and the body anthropometry greatly affected pressures at the seating interface during forward and backward rotations of the pelvis.…”
Section: Seat Adjustments To Induce Postural Movementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both studies investigated a relatively small postural change in pelvic tilt [27] and pelvic and trunk tilt [42] which are known to have a minimal effect on interface pressures [37, 38]. However, the slight pelvic movement was enough to effectively reduce the maximum pressure for a typically ectomorph (thin) person [27].…”
Section: Seat Adjustments To Induce Postural Movementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most sitting force studies have been focused mainly on static sitting for sitters weighing less than 136 kg, in wheelchair research (Gilsdorf et al 1990;Gilsdorf et al 1991;Aissaoui et al 2001;Chou et al 2002) and vehicle seat design (Rakheja et al 2002;Kolich 2004;Kolich and Taboun 2004;Tarczay 2005;Bush and Hubbard 2007;Moes 2007). Sitting force studies were also found in sitting comfort research with emphasis on sitting pressure distribution on a seat (Chow and Odell 1978;Drummond et al 1982;Bush and Hubbard 2007), which data can be converted to sitting forces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%