2003
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-0361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in Stereoacuity: Normative Description, Fixation Disparity, and the Roles of Aging and Gender

Abstract: Age-related deterioration in stereoacuity is reflected not only by a linear correlation between age and threshold but also by a catastrophic factor that produces more marked deterioration after age 60. Both factors are probably cerebral and not specifically related to stereopsis. The prevalence of fixation disparity in the normal population is probably more common than previously reported.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
100
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
9
100
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The near stereoacuity measurements were similar to previously reported. Median distance stereo acuity in this study was 38.4" comparable to 29.6" at 6 meters reported by Adams et al [17] and 37" reported by Zaroff et al [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The near stereoacuity measurements were similar to previously reported. Median distance stereo acuity in this study was 38.4" comparable to 29.6" at 6 meters reported by Adams et al [17] and 37" reported by Zaroff et al [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The accommodation control would require adequate fogging in the telescopic system. While, the effect of convergence can be removed by presenting the stimulus for 100ms [18]. Presenting the stimulus for such a short time is certainly possible with the Frisby Davis charts and American Optical charts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings suggest that the reduction of stereopsis is not associated with the decrease of visual acuity. Zaroff et al 23 applied random dot stereoacuity test and reported that while 88% of under-60-year-old subjects showed normal stereopsis, only 37% of those in their 60s and 25% of those in their 70s did. Hence, the rate of stereopsis defects increased with increasing age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may partly explain why the subjects had more diverse opinions on perceived depth quality and why they felt more comfortable viewing 2D videos. Lastly, humans exhibit a wide range of stereoacuity and stereosense [8], ranging from complete deficiency to better than normal. This ability would naturally affect a subject's impressions of both 3D distortions and comfort.…”
Section: Within Quality Assessment Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%