2019
DOI: 10.3354/meps13056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in the effects of ocean acidification on shell growth and strength in two intertidal gastropods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also supported by the unchanged expression and methylation of key biomineralization genes such as carbonic anhydrases, tyrosinases (except one putative tyrosinase3) and alkaline phosphatases (Li, Liu, et al, 2016; Miyamoto et al, 1996, 2005; Zhang et al, 2006). Shell growth is often found to be affected under OA in molluscan species, to quote a few examples: clams Chamelea gallina (Bressan et al, 2014), snail Tegula funebralis (Barclay et al, 2019) and oysters C. gigas (De Wit et al, 2018). However, shell growth is not affected in all species by OA; some species have unaffected shell growth such as the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis (Bressan et al, 2014), sea snail Nucella ostrina (Barclay et al, 2019), mussel Mytilus edulis , clam Arctica islandica (Hiebenthal et al, 2013) and abalone Concholepas concholepas (Manríquez et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also supported by the unchanged expression and methylation of key biomineralization genes such as carbonic anhydrases, tyrosinases (except one putative tyrosinase3) and alkaline phosphatases (Li, Liu, et al, 2016; Miyamoto et al, 1996, 2005; Zhang et al, 2006). Shell growth is often found to be affected under OA in molluscan species, to quote a few examples: clams Chamelea gallina (Bressan et al, 2014), snail Tegula funebralis (Barclay et al, 2019) and oysters C. gigas (De Wit et al, 2018). However, shell growth is not affected in all species by OA; some species have unaffected shell growth such as the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis (Bressan et al, 2014), sea snail Nucella ostrina (Barclay et al, 2019), mussel Mytilus edulis , clam Arctica islandica (Hiebenthal et al, 2013) and abalone Concholepas concholepas (Manríquez et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paired work on two common gastropods found in intertidal habitats along the US west coast highlights disparate responses amongst taxa. In a long-term exposure of the herbivorous gastropod, Tegula funebralis (the black turban snail), and a predatory counterpart, Nucella ostrina (the striped dogwhelk), to OA, Barclay et al. (2019) demonstrate both notably different changes between these two taxa in how shell properties shifted under altered seawater chemistry, as well as cryptic changes that were not obvious by eye.…”
Section: Interspecific Variation In Biomechanical Responsesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The black-dotted line at 200 N indicates conservative crushing forces exerted by adult crabs of C. productus (Taylor, 2000). Modified from Barclay et al. (2019).…”
Section: Interspecific Variation In Biomechanical Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, shell growth of some other species such as Nassarius festivus in Hong Kong was not significantly affected by reduced pH (950 and 1250 µatm for 31 days) (Zhang et al, 2016), thus indicating that sensitivity to ocean acidification is species-specific and needs to be explored in fine detail (Doney et al, 2020). Similarly, shell growth of Nucella ostrina was not affected when pH was reduced by 0.5 units for a period of 6 months, although its shell became 10% weaker under predation cues (Barclay et al, 2019). Temperature as a factor alone has been also proven to affect the formation of mollusc shells, such as in Chamelea gallina that formed lighter, thinner and more porous shells at higher temperatures resulting in reduced shell fracture load (Gizzi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%