2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-019-04264-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in the morphology of fine roots in Cryptomeria japonica determined by branch order-based classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study is a few that assessed intraspeci c variations in ne root morphological traits caused only by different genotypic backgrounds using three provenance types of C. japonica trees planted in a common garden and suggested that intragenerational tree acclimation to the growing environment, that includes soil chemical alteration by plant-soil interactions (Ohta et al 2019), is possibly affected by genotypic backgrounds. Several previous studies evaluating ne root morphological and anatomical traits of C. japonica focused on trait variations among root orders and their plasticity with environmental conditions and stand age (Tawa and Takeda 2015;Hishi et al 2017;Wada et al 2019). Although ne root morphological traits have plasticity against growing environments (Doi et al 2017;Zadworny et al 2017;Wada et al 2019), our common garden experiment suggests that intraspeci c variations in ne root morphology can be determined not only by environmental conditions but also by genotypic differences in trees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study is a few that assessed intraspeci c variations in ne root morphological traits caused only by different genotypic backgrounds using three provenance types of C. japonica trees planted in a common garden and suggested that intragenerational tree acclimation to the growing environment, that includes soil chemical alteration by plant-soil interactions (Ohta et al 2019), is possibly affected by genotypic backgrounds. Several previous studies evaluating ne root morphological and anatomical traits of C. japonica focused on trait variations among root orders and their plasticity with environmental conditions and stand age (Tawa and Takeda 2015;Hishi et al 2017;Wada et al 2019). Although ne root morphological traits have plasticity against growing environments (Doi et al 2017;Zadworny et al 2017;Wada et al 2019), our common garden experiment suggests that intraspeci c variations in ne root morphology can be determined not only by environmental conditions but also by genotypic differences in trees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Thus, there is functional heterogeneity in individual roots within ne root systems, which appears as phenotypic variations in anatomical and morphological traits (Hishi 2007;Hishi et al 2017). Fine root morphological traits, namely, root length, diameter, and branching order, are closely related to physiological functions, such as absorptive and transport capacities, lifespan, and mycorrhizal Wada et al 2019). Speci c root length (SRL), which is determined as root length per root mass, strongly re ects physiological traits such as absorptive capacity and lifespan (Eissenstat 1991;Ostonen et al 2007;McCormack et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fine roots have been commonly considered as a coherent "pool" of an arbitrary 0-2 mm root diameter class with the same dynamics, turnover rates, respiration costs and the same rates of water and nutrient uptake (Persson, 1980;Jackson et al, 1997). However, an increasing number of recent studies suggest that fine root functions can vary depending on the root order of the branching root system (Pregitzer et al, 1997;Majdi et al, 2001;Pregitzer et al, 2002;Guo et al, 2004;Wang et al, 2006;Hishi, 2007;Wang et al, 2007;Pregitzer, 2008;Valenzuela Estrada et al, 2008;Comas and Eissenstat, 2009;Fan and Guo, 2010;Rewald et al, 2011;Beyer et al, 2013;Rewald et al, 2018;Wada et al, 2019). These studies have clearly shown that several fine root traits such as diameter (D), length (L), specific root length (SRL), specific root area (SRA), root length density (RLD), branching density but also number of xylem vessels, tissue density, C/N ratios, phenolic, lignin and suberin contents, mycorrhizal colonization and median lifespans varied depending on the root order.…”
Section: Morphology and Anatomy Of Deep Fine Rootsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fine roots can be classified into different orders based on their branching pattern (Fitter 1982;Pregitzer et al 2002), RD and RTD generally increase with root order while SRL decreases have been found by numerous studies (Pregitzer et al 2002;Valenzuela-Estrada et al 2008;Yu et al 2022). Factors influencing intraspecific variation in fine root morphological traits may be influenced by root order (Doi et al 2017;Wada et al 2019), for example, Doi et al (2017) found that SRL of low-order (first to third) Chamaecyparis obtusa roots correlated with soil inorganic nitrogen concentrations, but SRL of high-order (fourth to sixth) roots correlated with soil C concentrations. In addition, as root order increases, roots undergoing secondary growth form a cork cambium with hydrophobic suberized cells that hinder the absorption of water and nutrients (Gu et al 2014;McCormack et al 2015), and secondary xylem growth that enhances transport capacity (Guo et al 2008;Wang et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%