2020
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv.12793634.v2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in the Structure and Activity of Commercial Palladium on Carbon Catalysts

Abstract: <p>Palladium catalysed hydrogenolysis is often the final step in challenging natural product total synthesis and a key step in industrial processes towards fine chemicals. Here we demonstrate that there is wide variability in quality of commercial sources of palladium on carbon (Pd/C), which results in differences in selectivity, reaction times, and yields. This is established through a combination of XRD, XPS, BET and TEM analysis, this will serve as a template for others to quickly identify a high-qual… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, deposition of hydrated PdO followed by in situ reductions with H 2 (changes of Pd(OH) 2 system caused by hydrogenation were shown by TEM, Figures S2 and S3 in Supplementary Materials ) provided the most efficient composites, whereas deposition of hydrated PdO followed by reduction with formaldehyde led to the formation of the least active systems. Though the majority of Pd/Support composites contain Pd in the oxidation states 0 and +2 simultaneously [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ], the action of hydrogen at the beginning of the hydrogenation process results in a reduction of Pd 2+ [ 44 , 49 ] (similar reduction of Pd 2+ to Pd 0 was observed under the action of CO [ 50 ]). Thus, different activity of the composites can be explained by in situ formation of the NPs, which have a different shape (different crystallographic planes exposed to the surface) or content of defects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, deposition of hydrated PdO followed by in situ reductions with H 2 (changes of Pd(OH) 2 system caused by hydrogenation were shown by TEM, Figures S2 and S3 in Supplementary Materials ) provided the most efficient composites, whereas deposition of hydrated PdO followed by reduction with formaldehyde led to the formation of the least active systems. Though the majority of Pd/Support composites contain Pd in the oxidation states 0 and +2 simultaneously [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ], the action of hydrogen at the beginning of the hydrogenation process results in a reduction of Pd 2+ [ 44 , 49 ] (similar reduction of Pd 2+ to Pd 0 was observed under the action of CO [ 50 ]). Thus, different activity of the composites can be explained by in situ formation of the NPs, which have a different shape (different crystallographic planes exposed to the surface) or content of defects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%